Open main menu
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in February 2012, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Contents

Requests

Nixten@ko.wikipedia

  Confirmed I blocked about 70 accounts and some ranges. --Vituzzu 16:56, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, We should more checking about two new bees. Kogurean, Doksamus have Nixten's pattern. --RedMosQ 12:12, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
  Confirmed and Cogurean while ~70% Ronain and St9999 (as usual you should check if their editing-patterns are compatible)
--Vituzzu 17:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
I think that Cogurean is correct. But Ronain and St9999 are not related to this pattern. although Ronain's pattern is that editing Korean historical article, he's editing is correct and he make references. St9999 is not related to it perfectly. --RedMosQ 17:22, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

I don't think so, but do you think that Ronain and St9999 using Nixten's IP? By the way I think nixten start to use open proxy. This is the clue. --RedMosQ 17:34, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Katisk@fi.wikipedia

All Jafeluv's results are   Confirmed
--Vituzzu 10:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Ette ole ehkä tulleet ajatelleeksi, mutta tämän sirkusesityksen lisäksi on olemassa vielä yksi vaihtoehdonrääpäle: Ottaisitte tälle tunnukselle langetetun eston pois, niin ei taatusti tulisi enää yhtäkään pelleilysukkista! Anteeksi muuten noista kahdesta, oli kieltämättä hiukkasen ikävästi tehty. --Juhko 20:55, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Deletista@pt.wikipedia

Please, view: list of sockpuppets. PcTalk 20:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Quintinense is too old. Possible groups for the others are listed below.

1

  • Keptauto
  • Deletista
  • Carnatiba

2

  • Marcus Luccas
  • Locoabreu
  • Wesley2011

3

  • Carnaval9
  • Keptauto
  • Loggosul
  • Vembaixada
  • Sempreavantemeuimpério
  • Sambalagoas

  Possible There are possible others, but not digging further for the scope of the request Will Dig a bit deeper after some time.--Jyothis 21:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

ptwiki Admins: Please review the following groups in the same range. Some may not be related, and the available info is not concrete enuf to mark them as confirmed or likely.

4

  • Mutaza
  • Arthur to
  • Gabriel Ferraz
  • Richard Leoni Leon
  • Othon Brando da Cunha Monteiro

5

  • Julianofischer
  • Tabierrenbach

6

  • Keptauto
  • Carnatiba
  • Carnaval9
  • Loggosul
  • Vembaixada
  • Sempreavantemeuimpério
  • Sambalagoas

8

  • Keptauto
  • Deletista
  • Veronykacosta
  • LucasAlmeida

9

  • Deletista
  • Carnatiba
  • DanielZacarias7
  • IBA RJ BR
  • Diasbc

10

  • Lopestitomatheus34
  • MachoCarioca

11

  • Luan borge
  • Fernandojorge1973
  • Melissa Ribeiro

12

  • Violet.Langdon
  • RodrigoGoMattos01

--Jyothis 16:05, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

ZZARTER@pt.wikipedia

Will be doing the request above for ptwikisome time today. Unless another steward gets to this before I can get to the one above, I will do it along with the other. --Jyothis 12:57, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

  • ZZARTER
  • WZARTER
  • User H
  • Mr. H
  • Hudson Ricardo
  • The X
  • The User
  • Living
  • To Live
  • TRUSTH
  • HRFS
  • WZARTER
  • EcoLive

  Confirmed --Jyothis 15:33, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Xelba.davi@pt.wikipedia

  Confirmed and also one more sock: R.r.berg (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date • CA • ST • lwcheckuser). -Barras 18:54, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

KAWAI@ko.wikipedia

  Completed - CU data is too old for others except for KAWAI. No related accounts found. — Tanvir | Talk ] 08:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Carliitaeliza@es.wikinews

  CheckUser is not for fishing. Trijnstel 21:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Heecfyahoo.ca@en.wikiquote

  Confirmed--Vituzzu 23:43, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Wait, confirmed to CatBurningMassacre (talk · contribs) as well? -- Cirt (talk) 02:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

I haven't performed a second CheckUser yet. I have instead asked the local CheckUser, see here. Trijnstel 17:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Rightpeople@zh.wikipedia

It's   Likely Goodeditor, Wukiwriter, Correctnews and Mytvcom are the same. Bettytseone is a   Confirmed sock of Goodeditor.
More accounts who are   Likely related: Boscobody, Specialgood, Sueling, Citywalking, Balleho and Turereporter. (Please check their edits.)
Rightpeople is technically   Unrelated and 正義者 is   Stale.
Kind regards, Trijnstel 18:32, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Many thanks!--Gakmo 00:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Donkey06@pt.wikipedia

Donkey06 is   Stale, but   Confirmed for Ogacihc = Selegna = Gabriel Rosetti. As for Kroywenn and Esramm, they seem   Unrelated. --FiliP ██ 10:17, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

LeoINTDP@pt.wikipedia

Is there a reason to believe that they are violating the policy on multiple accounts?   CheckUser is not for fishing, and just because two editors share an opinion does not mean that they are the same editor. If you can show evidence why they may be the same editor, great. Otherwise, local dispute resolution and/or protective measures seem more appropriate. Have I missed something? -- Avi 00:47, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Yes, there is good reason to suspect. Previously, LeoINTDP violated BLP in pt:Jesús Dátolo (view), the same name as possible sockpuppet. As shown previously, LeoINTDP had conflicts on page pt:Alexandre Pato. Please see the links and accept this request. I can answer any question you, but it will be a very bad English. Sorry for bad English. PcTalk 01:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
  •   Inconclusive Outside that their ISPs both are in the same geopolitical entity, I don't see an obvious connection. If another steward wants to review, that would be fine. -- Avi 01:42, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Turereporter@zh.wikipedia

  Confirmed that:
  • Tonesmaybe = Guideheads = Thatturn771 = Referspoke = Touchtouch666 = Moneyocean = Realblues = Aboutvital = Cloudraise = Haveseems = Heardused = Localbrief = Halfgoalsff = Tendssuch = Linesopendrr = Cleardance = Stepshaltdfgr = Handsblindships = Dataopenttr = Civilpaper = Beingsixty66 = Sleeppanic = Civiltypes = Axispenny = Madeblind = Whendropsada = Poemsnewly = Closebirds11111 = Bloodyears = Loopbrown = Aboutsteps55 = Rancheach333 = Totalahead = Hfduhfisudhis = Goalsclub = Comesroadhruhgr = Ideasroads = Spanblood = Wavesaway = Panelbased
  • Turereporter = Citywalking = Bettytseone, but likely   Unrelated to others
  • Passbybye = Passbyby, but likely   Unrelated to others
However, Rightpeople seems completely unrelated. As you can see, there is a clear sockfarm there, with somewhat usernames mostly having some kind of pattern. --FiliP ██ 10:46, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
  Comment See also this request above with some of these sockpuppets. Trijnstel 11:27, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. And, as an admin on zhwp asks (wp:AIV), could you please check whether those 40 users listed above are puppets of KellyMok (talk contribs deleted contribs logs block user block log CentralAuth AllContribs checkuser) or not? --Naiveandsilly 17:07, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
After a review of PeterSymonds we both agree it's   Likely the above sockpuppets are related to KellyMok. Trijnstel 19:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Oh, it may be a sockpuppets of Kellymok's puppet... Here comes the final 外劇迷 (talk contribs deleted contribs logs block user block log CentralAuth AllContribs checkuser). Sorry for any trouble made. Vandalism is rediculously complex on those articles of TVB dramas. --Naiveandsilly 16:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
That account doesn't exist. Are you sure you mentioned the correct username? Trijnstel 17:13, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
The account is 外剧迷 (talk contribs deleted contribs logs block user block log CentralAuth AllContribs checkuser)--Shizhao 01:54, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
My apologies for the delay. 外剧迷 is   Unrelated to this sockpuppet farm. Trijnstel (talk) 13:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Braz Leme@pt.wikipedia

The links you gave us do not provide any reason to check those users. pt:User:Paulista Separatista only edited the talk page, both others just have one or two edits on the page itself ... So no problem yet. a×pdeHello! 10:08, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Spambot @ zh.wikipedia

  Doing.... True that it would be better if you had the right to do it yourself. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 16:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
  Inconclusive I checked almost ten of these spammers, but there's unfortunately nothing to be done. All the ones I checked come from different IP ranges, some even come from different countries. I guess it would be better to improve the spam detection methods. I can help you if you want, just pick me out some of those spambot edits that have not been matched by the AbuseFilter and I will try to help you. Kind regards, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 16:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Lacerda Bhahia@pt.wikipedia

Como aconteceu vandalismo recente com ofensas, [20] e [21], inclua esse IP e usuários na verificação, baseado nas suspeitas aqui. (English: As happened with recent vandalism offenses, [...], include the IP and users in verification, based on suspicions here.):

Bruno Leonard 02:36, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

I feel obliged to inform all stewards in here that User:Bruno Leonard is completely unreliable, as show by his frequents blocks on PT-WP. His claim is preposterous, there's over a million users on PT-WP and he's trying to prove a random connection just because these users are in Curitiba, which is the 8th largest city in Brazil and so it has a significant amount of users on PT-WP. It seems to me that User:Bruno Leonard is a paranoid conspirator, but I'll let you reach your own conclusions.--31Julho1985 03:49, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
So I came upon this and I decided to post the links here, in this absurd request. I hope this shows how User:Bruno Leonard in an unreliable, paranoid conspirator.

Links: [[:Steward_requests/Checkuser/2011-02#Lacerda_Bhahia.40pt.wikipedia|[[1]]]] [[:Steward_requests/Checkuser/2011-02#189.106.112.243.40pt.wikipedia |[[2]]]] [[3]] --31Julho1985 04:01, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

  Not done Seems like   CheckUser is not for fishing applies fr33kman 05:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Eu acho uma total falta de irresponsabilidade simplesmente listar os suspeitos por cidade. Há quase 2 milhões de pessoas vivendo em Curitiba e refinar a lista de suspeitos por uma categoria criada por uma userbox é um total erro. Acham mesmo que um fantoche poderia cair no erro de indicar a localização de sua cidade por userbox? Raríssimos socks que eu vi usaram do recursos de userboxes. Não sei se posso ser suspeito, já que o meu IP é um número totalmente diferente do mencionado (201.89.79.126). Edito aqui regularmente há 3 anos e nunca fiquei sob este tipo de suspeita. Conheço o trabalho de alguns dos usuários mencionados como o Deyvid Setti e posso afirmar que ele faz contribuições responsáveis para o projeto. Esse tipo de seleção de suspeitos é muito superficial, me desculpem. (English:I think a total lack of irresponsibility simply list the suspects by city. Nearly 2 million people living in Curitiba actually and refine the list of suspects by a category created by a Userbox is a total mistake. Do you really think a sock puppet might fall into the error of indicating the location of your city using a Userbox? Socks that I saw very few used the resources of userboxes. I do not know if I can be suspicious, since my IP is a totally different number mentioned (201.89.79.126). I edict here regularly for 3 years and never been under such suspicion. I know the work of some of the users mentioned as Deyvid Setti and I can say that he is responsible contributions for the project. This type of selection of suspects is very superficial. Sorry.) Wallinson 00:35, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Translate to Portuguese: Eu sinto obrigado a informar [a] todos os stewards aqui que o Usuário:Bruno Leonard é completamente inconfiável, como mostram por freqüentes bloqueios na PT-WP. Sua alegação é preposterosa, há mais de um milhão de usuários na PT-WP e ele está tentando provar uma coneção aleatória só porque esses usuários são de Curitiba, que é a 8ª maior cidade no Brasil e por isso tem uma quantidade significativa dos usuários em PT-WP. Isto parece que o Usuário:Bruno Leonard é um paranóico conspirador, mas eu vou deixar você tirar [sic] suas próprias conclusões. (...) Então, deparei com isso e decidi postar os links aqui, neste absurdo pedido. Eu espero que mostre como este Usuário:Bruno Leonard não é confiável, [é] paranóico conspirador.
Quer dizer que a minha alegação posta pedido de verificação, ao tentar "provar uma coneção aleatória só porque esses usuários são de Curitiba (...)" é "absurda"? Como é que eu tenho provas irrefutáveis da maior suspeita que você é o mesmo que se disfarça em diversos IPs, hã? Como soube dessa verificação, pois nem sequer foi avisado em IPs ou usuários registrados (veja o histórico). Aliás, depois que postei essa verificação, você pediu pra sair da wikipédia e ainda vandaliza minha discussão da WP-PT e depois no meta por duas vezes aqui (IP 187.59.64.61 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)) e aqui (IP 189.34.91.21 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)), chamando de "(...) CHEFE DESTA GANGUE (...). UM BANDIDO (...).". Depois dessas edições, gerou dúvida: Por que esse usuário (31Julho1985) resolveu ser inativo, se o mesmo diz que não ter ligação e ainda depois das minhas denúncias? Esse usuário não é confiável e ainda descobri mais IPs em janeiro (189.123.241.108 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser) e 189.123.242.154 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)) e ainda tem usuários já estão desconfiando de você numa votação Wikipédia:Páginas para eliminar/Filipe de Fiúza e o pior, ao invés de se defender, me calunia ao chamar de "conspirador paranóico". Pode ter certeza que vai ter troco e não tenho medo das suas ameaças. Posso ter problemas por conta de diversos bloqueios, mas não sou igual a esse vândalo caluniador.
Sobre reclamação do usuário acima (Wallinson), não estou acusando todos os usuários de Curitiba só por que é 8ª maior cidade do Brasil e que a WP-PT tem 1 milhão de usuários (na verdade tem quase 1 milhão), mas apenas reafirmar que há um usuário que se disfarça de IPs e usuários registrados. O mais curioso é que quando posto esta verificação é bem lenta, mas comparar com outros casos, é rapidamente feita em poucos dias. E aí, algum checkuser não vai verificar as contas suspeitas ou querem que eu apresente "mais provas"?
(Translate to English: You mean put my claim check request, trying to "prove a random connection just because these users are in Curitiba (...)" is "preposterous"? How do I ​​evidences irrefutables of greater suspicion that you are the same as disguises himself in various IPs, eh? How did this check, it was not even warned in IPs and registered users (see history). In fact, after I posted this check, you ask to quit wikipedia and still vandalizing my discussion of the WP-PT and then the goal here twice (IP 187.59.64.61) and here (IP 189.34.91.21), calling "(...) THIS GANG BOSS (...). A BANDIT (...).". After these issues, generated questions: Why this user (31Julho1985) decided to be inactive, if it says it does not have a connection and even after my complaints? This user is not trusted IPs and also found out in January (189.123.241.108 and 189.123.242.154) and still have users are already suspicious of you vote in Wikipédia:Páginas para eliminar/Filipe de Fiúza and worse, instead of defending himself, slander to call me "paranoid conspirator". You can be sure it will have change and not afraid of their threats. I have problems on behalf of several blocks, but I'm not like this thug slanderer.
On complaint of the above user (Wallinson), I'm not accusing all users of Curitiba just because it is the 8th largest city in Brazil and the WP-EN has 1 million users (in fact has almost 1 million), but only to reaffirm that there is a user who disguises herself as IPs and registered users. The funniest thing is that when you put this check is very slow, but compared with other cases, it is quickly done in a few days. And then, some checkuser will not check the suspicious accounts or want me to present "additional evidence"?
). Bruno Leonard 00:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

  Not done fishing, don't ask again. This request is now final and closed. fr33kman 00:30, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Tá bom. Mas que fiquem avisados, que se ele voltar cometer novamente, vou postar nova verificação e novas evidências. Mas se rejeitar, não me venham a dizer que estou errado! (Translate to English: Alright. But be warned that, if they make it back again, I'll post new verification and new evidence. But if you reject, I will not say I'm wrong!). Bruno Leonard (talk) 00:50, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Ele voltou com ofensas contra mim, uma hora depois. Não acham coincidência esse vândalo, que se passa outra conta, me atacar? Só faltam verificar Veloster e Maranhense, que recentemente fizeram ataques contra mim (Translate to English: He returned with insults against me, an hour later. Do not think this coincidence thug, that goes account another, attack me? There are only checking Veloster and Maranhense, which recently made attacks against me.). Bruno Leonard (talk) 15:47, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
I've just closed both accounts Veloster and Maranhense, clearly troll-only accounts. Checking them I found dozens of puppets, I think a deeper check (plus a bunch of blocks) is needed. --Vituzzu (talk) 16:29, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Vituzzu, poderia citar quais são "dezenas de maionetes" a que referiu, aqui? (Translate to English: Vituzzu, could cite which are "dozens of puppets" that referred to, here?). Bruno Leonard (talk) 22:22, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Turereporter@zh.wikipedia 2

Two sets of sockpuppets are confirmed. I should note, however, that both sets are   Unrelated to Turereporter. Milyning is   Unrelated as well.
Group one:   Confirmed are:
Haveplot55dff, Guidekeeps, Shipneeds, Heardarmed, Dreamrate and Replyamong.
Group two (KellyMok):   Confirmed are:
Dothgraydgs, Draftholds, Stagetones, Watchstudy, Visithouse, Unitsideedgs, Limityour, Ageshead, Noiseorder, Moneyocean, Realblues, Aboutvital, Cloudraise, Haveseems, Heardused, Localbrief, Halfgoalsff, Tendssuch, Linesopendrr, Cleardance, Stepshaltdfgr, Handsblindships, Dataopenttr, Civilpaper, Beingsixty66, Sleeppanic, Holdsplain, Civiltypes, Axispenny, Madeblind, Whendropsada, Poemsnewly, Closebirds11111, Bloodyears, Loopbrown, Aboutsteps55, Rancheach333, Totalahead, Hfduhfisudhis, Goalsclub, Comesroadhruhgr, Ideasroads, Spanblood, Wavesaway, Shearbegan9999, Panelbased, Needwithwty, Pagetests, Atomtaken, Wingsradar, Courtsuit.
  Comment I locally blocked the underlying IP addresses of both group of sets. You may block the accounts yourself (lots are already blocked). Trijnstel (talk) 17:07, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Carl Carvalho@pt.wikipedia

  • Group 1 : Arthur Chevailier, Arthur Fontaine is   Confirmed
  • Group 2 : Carl Carvalho and Willer Mack is   Likely

Group 1 and Group 2 is   Possible, All from the same ISP--Shizhao (talk) 06:35, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Hanguozhichun@zh.wikipedia

Hello. Why do you have some suspicions that these users are abusing multiple accounts ? I'm sorry, but "sock puppetry" is not a valid reason. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 13:50, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
user 2 - 4 are already indef blocked as sockpuppets of user 1.   It looks like a duck to me User 5 has only 1 edit which shows no connection to other 4. I think I can close this request can be closed as not done. Bencmq (talk) 14:30, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
The user2-4 were continued to damage the entry about 晋城(Jincheng city) and 山西省(Shanxi Province). The spelling of user2 means "f**k your mother Shanxi pig", user4 was just identified as the sockpuppetry of user2-3.The name of user5 in chinese means "Henan province Zezhou city", but 泽州(Zezhou city) is another name of 晋城(Jincheng city, belongs to Shanxi province). you can check the edit history and the login records of these users.--Keasung (talk) 15:01, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
第二到第四个用户都已经是作为傀儡被永久封禁了,不必再查,请检查一下(点击block log查看)。The last user made only 1 edit in November while all other users are active January/February. Similarity in username (not even close if I say) is not enough reason to checkuser. Bencmq (talk) 15:19, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
  Not done per what Bencmq said above -- Quentinv57 (talk) 15:28, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Citedcloud@zh.wikipedia

There are two groups of accounts:
Roadsworth
Navalloans
Novelknown
Orderadded
Navaliron
Agentoften
Shorturban
Vividleave
Tiredurged
Dutybirds
Lovereach
Citedcloud
Ruralendedrgerg
Avoidtrips
and
Unitsideedgs
Dozenhopen
Limityour
Moneyocean
Mostneverff
Turnsother
Cleardance
Stepshaltdfgr
Alivetype
Proofloans
Arisemodel
Dataopenttr
Wavestype
Quickenemy
Nextkept991
Bloodyears
Leastempty
Both groups are   Likely to belong to KellyMok. Ruslik (talk) 11:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks so much for the help! --Miroir (talk) 16:43, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

李煌的老师@zh.wikipedia

  Confirmed
李煌的老师
李煌老师
李煌老师一
李煌的老师
李煌是学术骗子
Kongqingdong is a dog!
(SYS)2
黄志松
Panelequal
伟大的韩国
气功研究
反对民科
宇宙第一大国
李彦宏女士
银钨锗
Panelequal
苏州工业园区第三监狱
Stupidcat
鹦鹉者
看黄片上北大
王存臻
Zhxy 516
丁環是正確的
Historyexpert
FcukSihtSxe
杨启彪教授
Ruslik (talk) 11:36, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Polaco galeto@pt.wikipedia

  Not done: Polaco galeto is   Stale--Shizhao (talk) 06:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Outros IPs:
Translate to English:Others IPs:

  1. 189.30.110.184 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  2. 189.30.118.7 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Bruno Leonard (talk) 21:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC)