Steward requests/Checkuser/2012-01



It seems to me that the following accounts may be related:

  • 100범 = Rurun = Nausbisk
  • Givnofen
  • Difficure
  • Dusosansin
  • Lagnakard
  • Lagnaqa
  • Dawtow
  • Tcisfas
  • Ikass
  • Poreth
  • Cscheonsh

es:Magister Mathematicae 21:10, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Jancen sergio@pt.wikipedia

Unlikely to be related. es:Magister Mathematicae 02:05, 3 January 2012 (UTC)


Please, check with Marcus_Luccas@pt.wikipedia too. Both users have a similar behavior, attacking the same user. Desempates 17:10, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

BauruEri and Southstock are sockpuppets, and, at least for the moment, I have no evidences to investigate Marcus Luccas too. is   Unrelated. --Vituzzu 19:40, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Please check Quintinense. BauruEri/Southstock is very interessed of articles edited by socks of Quintinense (Lidbergue, for example). This articles edited by BauruEri is edited by Quintinense. View contribuitions of the users.-- 22:20, 3 January 2012 (UTC)


  Not done, doing this check will release private information about Kalogeropoulos. From your description above it is not sufficient to convince me to do so according to the Access to and release of personally identifiable information in the Privacy Policy. Unless, of course, Kalogeropoulos agrees to this check. Bencmq 07:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
The check is necessary, he threatens users not to write. His behaviour (if proven) leads to a removal of sysop rights according to the policy of el wiki. I urge you to see the last CU and contact the steward who performed it, he is able to provide more insight about this case.Peter.S.Hunt 07:42, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
I disagree with Bencmq about this, based on Freemans comments when this user was last checked here: october. Did the request and can say that users are   Likely sockpuppets. Same ISP, same UserAgent, but that specific IP has not been used by Kalogeropoulos. Laaknor 08:18, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Sure, didn't know about that part in the archive. Bencmq 07:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)


Edmilson Quebra-força and Biantez accounts are too old for verification and correlation to the recent ones.
Do you have any recent possible blocked sockpuppet ? es:Magister Mathematicae 05:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Please, try Marcus_Luccas@pt.wikipedia and Observadordocarnaval@pt.wikipedia . Thanks Desempates 05:12, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Alberto neumann edits are too old to verify.
Observadordocarnaval edits are too old to verify.
BauruEri does not seem related to Marcus Luccas.
closing as not conclusive. es:Magister Mathematicae 05:38, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm not Quintinense sock, and have more and not just because I edit on carnaval. it has a check up on me, including the Quintinense mentioned that I am from another user. ok!!---Biantez msg 3:53, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Bqa m@pt.wikipedia

These three accounts are already block, so, what is to be checked? --Vituzzu 02:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Needs to be checked if the account is a puppet Bqa these accounts other relatively. Halleltalk 02:16, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Actually my answers has been given while you were asking a check about three already blocked accounts, anyway   Confirmed the last account you added (Bqa m) matches Cm.ferreira.UNL and both of them are Sousa/Pinto's sockpuppets, btw there's no point in using the "bloqueio automático desabilitado" option with these accounts. --Vituzzu 02:19, 8 January 2012 (UTC)


Is there more evidence of abuse? At the moment   It looks like a duck to me. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Yes, these pages are January 13, January 14, January 25 and September 25. Francisco 23:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
  Confirmed but there are no other accounts. PeterSymonds (talk) 09:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


  •   Confirmed:
    • Hardjie
    • Bluseword
    • 跨界神话
    • 汉牯佬1
    • 捉鬼大汉
    • 天外使者
    • 覃秀丽
  • Technically   Unrelated but apparently part of another sock farm:
    • 覃伟雄
    • Weiyutong
    • Fknilaomu

--PeterSymonds (talk) 09:46, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. I have reported this to Steward requests/Global.--Zhxy 519 07:43, 11 January 2012 (UTC)


No user by the name "JefferNobreg", Escoteiropotiguar no other socks (Technically)--Shizhao 12:20, 11 January 2012 (UTC)


  Unnecessary -   It looks like a duck to me. If there are no other users, a checkuser is unnecessary; it's quite clearly the same person. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:00, 12 January 2012 (UTC)


Please check if Desempates[7] is related to Maddox[8] (please check in meta and wiki-pt). I have several suspicions that tie is an account used to circumvent the blocking of Maddox. I have some experience in deceive the checkuser, I know this is possible, but it is also possible to identify the geographic location of the accounts is the same. Here are several evidences indicated that Maddox is Desempates, but because of this check a who pointed "unrelated", some users no longer suspect of relations of accounts. See the evidences:

Time of account creation

Desempates made his first contribution in November 20, six days before the lock one month Maddox applied to a block that was more than previsible. During the month of November, edit offs often participating in discussions notabily criteria are well known, deletion of pages, like Maddox did.

Areas of unusual interest

Maddox was known about comics and television editing and TV-offs seem to like too, even attending an elimination voting on the subject. (Less than a month of registry)

Markings on quick elimination redirects with a history

Desempates marked redirects to History thing that Maddox has had and one of the disputes that led to me (Marcus Luccas). The redirect-labeled for ER, Desempates were also done by Marcus Luccas (I).

Fanaticism in scoring E.S.R.

Desempates whith less than one month record registered an various pages on the same subject for disposal semirrápida, which is why the lock had surrendered months before Maddox.

Requests of block against multiple users and disagreements with Marcus Luccas / Quintinense (I)

Desempates also very agile ask [blockages, even with the same so to speak Maddox's.

Insist of delete pages Marcus Luccas/Quintinense

Desempates also asked for quick elimination a page created by Marcus Luccas when the Jbribeiro1 the discussion he said "Any user is interested in moving this text to a personal page itself? The Quintinense not return anytime soon around here (and in turn, will xilindró pro again). The work looks good and need not be lost. Arthemius?". The proposition ERnesse again if it was not consensual, something characteristic of Maddox.

Language very similar to the Maddox

Also in pt:Wikipédia:Esplanada/propostas/Definição de critérios de notoriedade para sobrenomes (8dez2011) Desempates (has less than a month) shows extreme knowledge of Wikipedia's policies, such as "Wikipedia is not a primary source of data , "and" Wikipedia is not a dictionary, "(Maddox often cited pt:WP:WNE).

Alternate hours editing

Take into account also the days and hours in which both edit because offs and Maddox never edit while allowing change of geographic location or at least computer. When Maddox was blocked last time it was different than hitherto not requested review of the blockade, but was defended in its discussion page for playoffs, as seen from the section below.

Desempates instransigente defense of Maddox

When Maddox is blocked, Desempates will defend him and also here (WARNING THIS).

"Coincidences" detected by other user

Belanidia, Heitor and Vanthorn to have realized, though not explicitly stated, be a case of Duck.

Edit War in template

In Predefinição:Sabia que Maddox got confusion with the July 7 MachoCarioca, which led to the protection of the page on July 8. On December 23, Desempates got further blurring by the same reason.


Atually the community discusses the 11º block of the user Maddox (see). The debate may be influenced by the account Desempates. Moreover, the blockade fraud may be being made ​​to perpetuate the destabilizing behavior of the user, previously disapproved by the community. In August, Maddox rounded a block, as can be seen in pt:Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Discussão de bloqueio/Maddox/5 through the IP He confirm the rounded a block, but no reblocked by its block has been canceled.

I ask you here to assess the merits of the application, not who is asking. And please do a thorough evaluation of results, paying attention to the possibility of the user to edit the home of a friend, public computer, or even lend a friend your password to another location edit for a time, to foil any checkusers. Keep in mind the importance of this case to the Wiki-pt, as the number of conflicts with other users is very high. 'Please clarify the relationship between Maddox and Desempates, if it is really "unrelated", or it may be "possible". Listen to the possibility of the user to have borrowed his account to a friend in another state for a few days, or posted to an lan-house as a way to deceive any check. So please check all logs that are shown. Already, thanks! Quintinense 17:24, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

This user requested this check is Marcus Luccas (Quintinense/Southstock/BauruEri). -- 19:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
  Not done I won't check anything without a local input, CU is not a revenge instrument. --Vituzzu 19:14, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
This is not a simple revenge, the arguments are all there. Forget for a moment that I did ask (argumentum ad hominem), judge for yourself whether the claims it makes sense or not, or contact any of those suspected of coincidences and ask to come here to endorse the request. Quintinense 21:12, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Btw the checkuser never "absolves" so I have to renew my not done. --Vituzzu 21:21, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Not understand. Quintinense 21:27, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
I solicit the block of Quintinense (absing mutiple accounts), please. -- 22:36, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
  • I think the applicant of this check must be nuts... Anyway, to avoid suspicions, I authorize the sysops to perform this check.

Regards Desempates 22:50, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

↑ --Vituzzu 22:54, 13 January 2012 (UTC)


Again? Which part of not done is hard to understand? --Vituzzu 22:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
I not understand you. "Again"? Accept this check, I'm not Quintinense. -- 22:45, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
You have been asking for check for months, under various nicknames. --Vituzzu 22:54, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
I swear I'm not a sock. -- 22:58, 13 January 2012 (UTC)


This is rather inappropriate considering your dispute, but this check is mainly   Not done per the results of this request. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
I am not talking about checking Bellavista1957, Rostamdastan and Solhosafa against each other, but I made a request to check Sansoorchi to make it clear who really is (Bellavista1957 or Rostamdastan or Solhosafa)? Thanks AMERICOPHILE 16:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
  CheckUser is not for fishing. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)


  Confirmed, no other socks found. Bencmq 12:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)


  It looks like a duck to me--Vituzzu 12:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Higor Douglas@pt.wikipedia

  Doing... @Vituzzu, I already performed a CheckUser, but I'd like to hear your opinion. Trijnstel 22:58, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
I'll review my results on tomorrow, I'm too tired now. --Vituzzu 00:00, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
  Unrelated by CU, only Rcandre and Higor Douglas shere some datas. --Vituzzu 01:24, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


All users have been blocked, and apparently last 7 users are {{duck}}. Any other reasons to check? --Bencmq 06:27, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Besodara is first user and the other users are blocked because of name's resemblance. I will talk another reason. korean wikipedia has been trolled by similar 체크유절's pattern. the pattern is that specific users has insisted admins of korean wikipedia rule with an iron hand. We think that those users are one of the specific users. --RedMosQ 06:54, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
  Confirmed. This user uses very dynamic IP and open proxies. No other obvious socks found. Bencmq 07:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Esodara and Cesodara too, but you already got them. Bencmq 07:38, 22 January 2012 (UTC)


  •   Inconclusive without identical IPs.--Jusjih 02:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


  Not done   It looks like a duck to me--Vituzzu 01:25, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Beijing NPOV vandal @zh.wikipedia

穆恩利伯蒂 can be Cuikun, 赵冬2007 and maybe 马鑫彬 and Dingshanlong
张云沛 and 刘端勇
Dingshanlong is Zhangyunpei2011
Also 大烧饼 is related and there are some possibilities that 赵天胤 is related too.
A rangeblock on is applicable with a few side effects, the same with will also work but will affect another user which can be given with ip block exempt.
--Vituzzu 10:48, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you, Cuikun is idle but all the rest appears to be him. I've blocked those ranges for 2 weeks. --Bencmq 11:22, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Ὥσπερ γὰρ ἀφ' ἑκατέρων@el.wikipedia

The users el:Χρήστης:Αλεχάντρο Υγριέκα, el:Χρήστης:Νεοσύστατος Πρίγκηψ and el:Χρήστης:Lakis Patisia there are known in the el.wikipedia community as puppets of user el:Χρήστης:Μυρμηγκάκι. For example the in a subpage of the user-page FocalPoint (admin @el.wikipedia) el:Χρήστης:FocalPoint/Δοκίμια/Χρήστες όπως τους θυμάμαι/Μυρμηγκοφωλιά there are various personas/puppets of this user el:Χρήστης:Μυρμηγκάκι has used the last months. Please investigate if el:Χρήστης:ΕλληνικόΣυναξάρι or el:Χρήστης: or el:Χρήστης:Ὥσπερ γὰρ ἀφ' ἑκατέρων are the same puppets with el:Χρήστης:Αλεχάντρο Υγριέκα, el:Χρήστης:Νεοσύστατος Πρίγκηψ and el:Χρήστης:Lakis Patisia (the last three are puppets of el:Χρήστης:Μυρμηγκάκι). Ggia 15:24, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Ὥσπερ γὰρ ἀφ' ἑκατέρων → Glascov5, Fleris, Μούτρο, ΓεύσηΕλληνικήΜπανάνα, Εύγεστος225, Tzinipa, ΗλεκτροφόραΚαλώδια and ΕλληνικόΣυναξάρι
Αλεχάντρο Υκριέγα → Αλεχάντρο Υγριέκα
Νεοσύστατος Πρίγκηψ → Kolitiri, Τρομαγμένος ξύπνησα, Kilitiri, Κάβουρας Ένας, NBvirily
Lakis Patisia → Παναγιώτα Ρόδη
These are raw results, there are many other accounts to check, I'll do it on tomorrow I hope. --Vituzzu 01:53, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
  DoneFirst group:
Ὥσπερ γὰρ ἀφ' ἑκατέρων, ΕλληνικόΣυναξάρι,, Glascov5, Fleris, Μούτρο, ΓεύσηΕλληνικήΜπανάνα, Εύγεστος225, Tzinipa, ΗλεκτροφόραΚαλώδια and ΕλληνικόΣυναξάρι
Secondo group:
Αλεχάντρο Υκριέγα and Αλεχάντρο Υγριέκα are related to Νεοσύστατος Πρίγκηψ, Kolitiri, Τρομαγμένος ξύπνησα, Kilitiri, Κάβουρας Ένας, NBvirily, Ο χονδρός και ο λιγνός, Στάθης, Έλα κοντά μου, ZeeGee and the Ants, DannManTau, Αμβρόσιος.Κ, Εργοτέχνης, Branice, Vraxiolakias, Καρηκομοων, Lakis Patisia, Παναγιώτα Ρόδη, Κύκνος, NRK2011, Ματωμένα Δάκρυα, Movie star, Plinomos, Kartounos, Wehnekoeh, Guard'21, ΝΙΚΟΣ Χ, Koursaros tou oneirou, Volos F, Inconnu par ailleurs, Db 81, O Filikos Xenonas, ΘωρΒασιλ, Καρρορης, Η Τρελλή Ζαρτιέρα, Adieu mein kleiner gardeoffizier, Trongma, Μεγαλα προσόντα. Δεν χωράς πουθενά, Σωλήν, Ντίνος, Ανθούλης+Τάσος, Gian.Sfa, Μύριος, 20 χρόνια καραβάνα, Η Τρελή Ζαρτιέρα, Teokafa, Tasoula Dask, Μαρίνα, Το πράσινο άλογο του Κολοκοτρώνη, Μεγαλα προσόντα. Δεν χωράς πουθενά, Σωλήν, and maybe Drangons999,
NOTE: the second group could be divided into two subgroups.
Various groups indicates group of account directly linked, but, to me, *all* them are related with each other. Finally, I have no objection in a counter-check by another steward.--Vituzzu 15:36, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your check, in el.wikipedia we have started a discussion about these two groups. Ggia 14:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


  Not done. Please don't submit this kind of requests when there's no real need of technical evidence to justify a block. Both users were/are already blocked (1 - 2). Thank you. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 23:40, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Yes they were, but for different reasons, the user Renatomfroes was not blocked by use of multiple accounts, but by vandalism, and he is no longer locked.Érico13 00:02, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Elias Vital Da Silva Júnior@pt.wikipedia

  Declined because   CheckUser is not for fishing. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 15:44, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Lan-gou-qu-si @zh.wikipedia

Hello. I did not check 王泽一 as I don't see where he could be related to others. Lan-gou-qu-si and 龙城游魂 may use multiple accounts but we can be sure that no one is in the list you wrote above.

The following users are   Confirmed with the confirmed group on the previous request :

  • 玻璃人
  • 韦荣光
  • 汉牯佬1
  • 钟馗捉鬼
  • Moungder
  • Kangtyu
  • 张胜利
  • Bludkert
  • Jygtfrh7
  • 捉游鬼
  • 石新华

Quentinv57 (talk) 12:52, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. As the former CU result (above) showed, they are not only one IP group. So I'm not surpised with your result. --Zhxy 519 14:00, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Miss apple (manzana)@es.wikinews

  Question: The account "No a la SOPA" doesn't exist. Are you sure you would like a check for that account? Trijnstel 20:59 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Yes, Confirmation link --MadriCR 21:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Ehm, please click on the link you gave me and you'll read in red: "User account "No a la SOPA" is not registered." Trijnstel 21:03, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, This is --MadriCR 21:05, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
(after ec) Ah, I heard from Savh on IRC that you meant No a la SOPA, (with a comma). Trijnstel 21:06, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Miss apple (manzana)‎, Carliitaeliza and No a la SOPA, are   Confirmed. No comment with regard to the IP address. Trijnstel 21:20, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
  Comment I globally locked all three accounts. Trijnstel 21:26, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

도야쿠@ko.wikipedia / 모두의사전@ko.wikipedia

  1. 도야쿠 is 파란모기
  2. 윤성현동생 is Karammarak
  3. 중딩소년 is 박틱스짱또7, 카라멜 마끼아또를 좋아하는 의무경찰, 츄군덕스럽게, 석장리
  4. 리순신 is NEARMISS, 만종역, NEREVES and maybe Ryu Si-won and Ryu Shi-won, 모두의사전, S222, 직인날인, 관찰사 and maybe Lnx
Group 3 and 4 are related while the other two are slighty different.
--Vituzzu 19:23, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Do you mind if I request more checking? 경라철도 who we think 경라고속철도's duck request at ko:w:위키백과:사용자 관리 요청 recently. He insisted that blocking of 경라고속철도 must be cleared because 경라고속철도 not related NEARMISS in "도야쿠@ko.wikipedia / 모두의사전@ko.wikipedia" checking. But we think 경라고속철도, 경라철도 is related with NEARMISS or many socks puppet. So we request checking about 경라철도, 경라고속철도 and many related puppet of 2 users. --RedMosQ 07:02, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
It's quite hard to me to read your language (that's the main reason it took me so much time to fulfil your request), so can you please tell more precisely which other checks do you need? --Vituzzu 19:16, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
OK. I give you more explanation. At 18 Jan 2012, 경라철도 requested that 경라고속철도 must be cleared from his blocked. [24] Because 경라고속철도 was not detected in that checking, "도야쿠@ko.wikipedia / 모두의사전@ko.wikipedia". but we believe strongly that 경라고속철도 is NEARMISS and Unypoly who make many puppets and We think that 경라철도 is 경라고속철도's duck too. So we request checking for any other puppets of 경라철도 and 경라고속철도. lastly, I give you list that you should check.
  • Any likely puppets which 3 users have.
    • 경라고속철도
    • 경라선
    • 경라철도

--RedMosQ 03:20, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

These three accounts are   Confirmed, and also 코레1 but they are *not* directly related to the other puppets listed. There's some slight similarity but it's not enough to say confirmed by CU. Btw checkuser is just an easily circumventable tool, so the "human recognition of puppets" should take precedence over it. --Vituzzu 11:22, 30 January 2012 (UTC)