Steward requests/Checkuser/2011-03



The following request is closed: not done Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
  Additional information needed - sorry I do not understand this request. Why a CU is needed here? Thanks, -- Dferg ☎ talk 21:42, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
  Not done unclear request and no further info forthcoming. fr33kman 00:27, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


The following request is closed: done Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Could you check ka:user:Ouzo the IP-address of this user and, I’d like to know if there is still any contributions of this user in Georgian Wikipedia.

  • Discussion: No local Checkusers;
  • Reason:He/she uses several accounts and acts autocratically, does not pay attention the talks. --Petre17 16:39, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  Additional information needed I think that we need more info here. Which are the suspected sockpuppet accounts?, where is the ongoing abuse? In case that there's abuse: are other methods (like blocking) not working? Why technical evidence will help you in this case? In few words:   CheckUser is not for fishing
-- Dferg ☎ talk 18:12, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

This user, which basic account is Diaoha, has been registering himself with variety names and tries to scandalize Georgian Wikipedia. One of his accounts is mentioned above (Revenge time). Except this, he has several accounts (ka:user talk:Iaponeli – we are sure in this.), 13th december he registered new name, after he changed template autocratically in Georgian Wikipedia, which caused harsh discussion. Admins can not block him, because of his intrigues, he made friends with some of admins and they interrupt us during working in Wikipedia. If you can assure us that these accounts belong to one and same user, so admins could could have appropriate arguments to block him. Hope, you will get correct decision and let avoid Georgian Wikipedia scandals. --Petre17 20:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Could you please fasten the discussion, because some one is prepearing the provocation.--Petre17 14:56, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
  Done Ouzo and NewOuzo are the same, Revenge time appears unrelated. fr33kman 02:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)


The following request is closed: not done Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
  •   Additional information needed Does Persian Wikinews allow requests for self-checks? If so, can you please link to the policy here. Thank you. -- Avi 03:51, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
  •   Not done - Sorry, but I doubt that this is useful. If there is no need for checking and there is no account to complare to, it is somehow like fishing. I don't think that such checks should be done. -Barras 13:32, 2 March 2011 (UTC)


The following request is closed: done Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
  •   Inconclusive or   weakly possible in my opinion. If another steward wants to doublecheck my result is welcome to do so. Thank you, -- Dferg ☎ talk 18:36, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  •   Unrelated Although both users have sockpuppets, they are unrelated. User Achun1111y is not a problematic one, user Achun1112y is one of many blocked sockpuppets. User Achun1111y has created one sockpuppet just after his or her primary account has been blocked. I suggest unblocking user Achun1111y. If you need the list of Achun1112y's sockpuppets, please open another request. --Millosh 07:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
    • Umm, Okay. Thank you, sir! --Idh0854 08:25, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
    • And we trying to track down sockpuppets of Achun1112y, also we nosed out sockpuppets of Achun1111y.(User "Caycedo736", User "Marcha Libertadora"). Thank you. We will request list of Achun1112y's sockpuppets, soon. Thank you. --Idh0854 08:54, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Could you investigate other sock puppets of Achun1111y?

These are confirmed sock puppets. His accounts are already blocked from ko, en, ja, es, and lo. -- ChongDae 08:49, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

  Confirmed except for Caycedo736 as you must ask the local checkusers on enwiki. fr33kman 00:43, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


The following request is closed: done Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by RafaAzevedo (talk) , at 00:03, 19 February 2010
  Unrelated--Shizhao 07:03, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Were they compared to the users shown on the diff above? That was the main purpose of the request, sorry if I did not let that perfectly clear. RafaAzevedo 07:24, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
  Unrelated Yes, I rechecked and compared to the users on that diff and they are unrelated. fr33kman 00:55, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


The following request is closed: done Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Please include IPs and, which are suspected to have been used by YoudaCamper to evade blocking last 5 February.--Darwinius 02:42, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Also to be included: JLRC,, and, mentioned here.
Maddox 13:44, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Please include as well Joff, a "new" user with the same modus operandi. RafaAzevedo 17:24, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Please add, another IP acting in cohorts with Youda Camper.--Darwinius 23:29, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Please also include Chocolate Preto, user with the same behaviour and editing purposes. 22:51, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Please include and Wjalves. Same behaviour. Maddox 21:10, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
We have an urgent situation of disruption going on at wiki-pt involving those users, this request is almost 10 days old, can please someone have a look at this?--Darwinius 23:28, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
How so? I'm not a sock puppet of YoudaCamper. Do you mind very well, Maddox. I will ask lock on Brazilian Wikipedia.I`m NOT Youda Camper.--ElectroStatic Jolt 00:25, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
  • I don't believe YoudaCamper is JATV.
  • JATV is Wjalves and some IPs on the 201.* range above mentioned.
  • ElectroStatic Jolt is also ElectroBot Jold (evidently) and he's related to the 189.100.* range mentioned.
  • Chocolate Preto = Maria Mayer = Boneco de Neve = Cão e Gato
  • Nothing I can conclude on the rest of accounts.

es:Magister Mathematicae 01:55, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Wait a minute... ElecrtoStatic Jolt is related to the 189.100.* range - the same one YoudaCamper used to evade a block? No comments on that?
Maddox 14:25, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
189.100/14 is a massive range of people, there will be many, many people editing ptwiki using it. fr33kman 01:02, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
How so? I'm not a sock puppet of YoudaCamper. Do you mind very well, Maddox. I will ask lock on Brazilian Wikipedia.--ElectroStatic Jolt 23:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

JimmyTwoShoes fan@global

The following request is closed: not done Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The following request is closed: done, but no more without local consensus Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Beangbag—there is no user with such username. Can your also explain in more detail why this checkuser is necessary. Ruslik 11:55, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
There does not seem a prima facie case for use of CU here. I don't personally see evidence of abusive multiple user accounts just from the diffs and you should already have good evidence prior to coming to SRCU, not come here to get the evidence.   CheckUser is not for fishing As for a global lock, those are for xwiki abuse and not when local blocks will work. fr33kman 19:15, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Sorry I wasn't able to get back to you earlier. There's some evidence that this account belongs to a prolific vandal named NewPak2 which was blocked some time ago in April; often it is the case that we try to contain his inappropriate behavior on Wikiversity, but it occasionally spreads to other projects like Wikisource where he trolls, like this example and a more recent one. We've also had to combat disruption locally, especially in cases of privacy violations he caused, such as those to this page. Often it seems that he does not openly disclose that he is the same person when, or if it is true, he makes multiple contributions to the same pages, and, except for the instance where his IP signs as Jacklover, he does not link that Jacklover account to the other ones either, as if to avoid scrutiny or more blocks. If there was a different solution to try to restrict his creation of new accounts or migrating to any other projects (other than Wikiversity, Wikisource appears to be a favourite habitation of his) I'd like to hear, and maybe apply it to him. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 20:35, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
"There's some evidence"; can you list it here please? Right now, I'm still not making the connection. fr33kman 21:29, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
They all have a strange predisposition to edit Mabuabsdd and Draubb related stuff, sometimes revealing private information that need to be deleted. Ruslik 08:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
  Doing... ok fr33kman 01:36, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
  Confirmed also v:User:Mabuabsdd, v:User:Ascoboo, v:User:Bhainbore, v:User:Aaqiby1, v:User:Jacklover1, v:User:J.amdjfkakaasdd, v:User:Bac, v:User:Drackalarimo, v:User:Nelvada, v:User:Judydoudy & v:User:Ritnor. I'd suggest a range block of if you wish to have more effective defence. fr33kman 02:06, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Caveat emptor: since the IPs used here localize to a school(s) in VA it is feasible that this means that it is a shared range. The user agents of all of the above, however, are identical. This could also mean more than one student is using the same computer, however all edits are to the same articles roughly. Local admins will have to decide the weight of this CU in that regards. fr33kman 02:44, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Fr33kman, were you aware of the prior checkuser request from TeleComNasSprVen regarding v:User:Mabuabsdd? He did not link to it. Similarly to this report, most accounts listed and locked then had no contributions off of Wikiversity.
  • Date of last edit on WV:
  •, 4 February 2011 only apparent edit outside of en.wikiversity is an apology. (Prior editing and block on en.wp may be the same editor, but unlikely.)
  • Beangbag1, 11 February 2011, no edits outside of en.wikiversity. No blocks.
  • Jmququ44, 10 February 2011 single nondisruptive edit to en.wikisource. No blocks.
  • Denial 13:10, 4 February 2011. account appears isolated to Wikiversity. No blocks.
  • Dkabbhodofbsd, 13:08, 28 January 2011. no edits outside Wikiversity. No blocks.
  • Draubb has been editing heavily since the other accounts, and he's been about as responsive as I'd expect for someone who is possibly seven years old, maybe eight. I requested he confine himself to one account, and it seems he has. I requested that he stop creating pages in mainspace, and seems to have mostly respected that, except for what may have been errors in moving files, he's been moving pages he created under other user names into his own user space, which I have encouraged. He has used real names, for himself and his apparent friends, and backslid on that recently, but is generally cooperating.
  • Wikiversity administrators have been helpful in working with this user, and the work load required has not been high, compared to what existed earlier when the approach was delete and block. Fr33kman, there was no need for "defence."
  • TCNSV has been opposed, on Wikiversity, to my efforts to educate this very young user or users. I cannot see deleted pages, but the guidance to deal with disruption using local blocks rather than checkuser and global locks has obviously not been followed.
  • I was prepared, seeing this report, to suspect that there had been additional cross-wiki inappropriate editing. I don't see it.
  • TCNSV came here for what appears to be an exclusively Wikiversity problem or issue, instead of first requesting assistance from WV administrators; he seems to think of meta checkuser as a substitute for local administrative supervision, he can file requests here and nobody from Wikiversity notices. I only happened to see this today because of other business. There was no need for checkuser on these accounts, they are all obviously either the same user or the same "family" of users, probably using the same class computer. Edits from home IP are unusual.
  • I do appreciate the request by TCNSV not to lock Draubb, but consider this request to have been a waste of checkuser time, as well as mine to check out the cross-wiki contributions that, it turns out, don't exist.
  • Fr33kman, you are correct that this may be a single class computer. The edits tend to come in at the same time of day, roughly, during the school week. I have been unable to ascertain if there is more than one person involved. A series of accounts were globally locked as a result of TCNSV's prior filing, and I requested information from the user (Draubb), but the user doesn't respond much to questions. I deal with a seven year old every day, my own, and it's normal! However, before that locking, I did see edits that appeared to be different kids, friends, editing the same pages. This may be disconcerting to WMF volunteers on other projects than Wikiversity, but it is not necessarily a violation of WV policy.
  • These are not "articles." They are all edits to user space pages, except for what may be errors. In the future, there may be some "classes" created that would be appropriate for these kids to edit. For now, Draubb is practicing with wikitext and is learning how to edit nondisruptively. If you have or have had a seven-year old, that's a big deal! --Abd 03:27, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
  Comment okay, on your say-so we'll leave this person to the hands of the local community. I'm a bit upset that TCSNV did not link to his prior request, I would not have touched this had I known. I shall address that with him. From now on please get a local consensus for further CUs to be done on this matter. Good luck! fr33kman 04:16, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Apologies to TCNSV, the link was there in the discussion, I must have missed it completely. fr33kman 06:32, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


The following request is closed: done Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

more user Steward_requests/Checkuser#布列坦妮@zh.wikipedia--UAL55 11:22, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

  Done. Loneyuyeung. Ccasci, 布列坦妮   Confirmed. 仙弩   Likely. מתניה 11:44, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

The following request is closed: done Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Result: No named users / other accounts associated with this IP --Eptalon 21:38, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Luz do Sol@pt.wikipedia

The following request is closed: done Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Eugen Dihoru@ro.wikinews and Rebel@ro.wikinews

Memo18(contribs|talk|ro.wp(t)) 19:34, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

  Declined - both are trusted users on Romanian projects, so we would need more concrete evidence to process this favourably. PeterSymonds 19:37, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
  Comment Indeed, in fact if there is evidence it must now be given since the accusation has been made. So I've unclosed this case and Memo18 is no responsible for providing evidence of wrong doing. fr33kman 21:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
  Comment I'll have a word with Memo18 directly instead. fr33kman 22:05, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
If is not done, IS NOT DONE.. i don't want more the check. Memo18(contribs|talk|ro.wp(t)) 22:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
I think the issue is not that you withdrew the check, but why you'd think it was valid in the first place. fr33kman 03:02, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

several users@el.wikipedia

While I see the reason for this request (several accounts reverting to the same text, in particular), I'm not sure I understand why you've listed the QKU1771 account with the rest of these. The account only has one edit to the Liakopoulos article, and that doesn't look very troubling.[18] Jafeluv 20:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Indeed, there was a mistake about him. --Geraki TL 21:01, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

  Completed: Please note that these are technical results only:

  •   Possible bordering on   Likely:
    • Belisarious
    • Alisa
    • Spathion
    • Logikosnous
    • Halaros
    • Elapollon
    • Halaros
    • Halkos
    • Apeirossss
      All of these are in the same location, with similar user agents; some are in the same IP range.
  •   Possible bordering on   Inconclusive:
    • Aithairios
      Same location (different to the first set), but different IPs and user agents.
  •   Inconclusive:
    • Neeskens100
    • Johnnyz
      Different useragent; different IP range; no location data.
  •   Unrelated
    • Vivianna

--PeterSymonds (talk) 21:39, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, can you also check el:User:Halkos and el:User:Apeirossss? --Geraki TL 21:44, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Done; they have similar UAs, but not identical; they're on different IPs, but in the same location. Added them to the first list since everyone in the first list is from that area. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:53, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Arendal janitsjar@no.wikipedia

Following account are   Confirmed (first group):

  • Arendal janitsjar
  • NEK baklengs
  • Novotal
  • Piperviken
  • Graciasal
  • Speilvann
  • Ula-klassen
  • Deniros
  • Skier2011
  • Tripolinos

This is the first farm. All use the same IP and same UA.

Following accounts are also   Confirmed (second group):

  • Anne Sofie Ofrim
  • Menstruasjon
  • Heldige Andreas
  • Privat eiendom
  • Electroshock
  • Skiva
  • Lars marius ryholt
  • Latter
  • Maxind
  • Heldige sjefen
  • Heldiggrisen
  • Krikling
  • Dåremi
  • Pioneer
  • Lelele
  • Azur Theodor Le Sivert
  • Sex bæsj
  • Evil Azur 3

This is the second farm. All mentioned users use the same IP and UA.

The used IP by those two groups look unrelated to each other. -Barras 13:45, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Barras! Finn Rindahl 14:11, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Coração Partido@pt.wikipedia

Relation between pt:user:Coração Partido and pt:user:Chocolate Preto   Confirmed
Also pt:user:Cidadão Brasileiro, pt:user:Vitor Mendonça Melo and pt:user:Talita Leme Greco are accounts of Chocolate Preto
YoudaCamp is   Unrelated with Chocolate Preto/Coraçao Partido. -- Màñü飆¹5 talk es 07:00, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


--UAL55 08:01, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Why do you think these accounts are related? (except that both voted delete) Ruslik 18:15, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
These were   Confirmed in an en.wikipedia investigation this month. See en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Michaelpkk/Archive. Jafeluv 08:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
  Confirmed Ruslik 09:42, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


The following request is closed: not done Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 16:01, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

They both reverted your edits to this article. I do not think it is an appropriate CU request. Ruslik 17:48, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
I really would like to request this verification. This people never stop. Justus edited some months ago in political articles, stopped, and now he returned. And he used other IPs at Governo Lula to force an ghost majority against other editors. Darwin , a famos editor in pt-wiki, says "Justus is a famous socker" here: 15:46, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
  not doneThis is an wholly inappropriate request, and is therefore denied. fr33kman 21:04, 17 March 2011 (UTC)


This vandal has returned once again to pt.wikt. Please check if the users listed above are the same person.

If you could check other recent users as well (to see if he has been evading our radar), it would be great, too. Thanks.

--ValJor 19:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Diabo e Santo has not edited since 2009, Thaberneiro has made no edits at all, and Taberneiro has made one edit since 2006. So, there is basically nothing to check. Ruslik 19:53, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Here is a recent edit by Taberneiro, and another even more recent by Thaberneiro (where he is complaining that Taberneiro was blocked from logging in). And the two IPs have edited as well. Please, check again, I really need to determine if they are the same person (I'm almost sure, but I need the CU support).
You may leave Diabo e Santo out of the check, he has not edited since 2009 because he has been banned for life from our site.
Thanks again for your help in fighting this vandal.
--ValJor 20:07, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
  Confirmed Taberneiro and are the same user.
  Inconclusive Thaberneiro and may be associated, but CU is not conclusive. Ruslik 20:44, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Sorry for reopening the case, but the vandal is now using many different IP addresses, so I would like to ask you to check if any of these are part of open proxies and if they are, to block the corresponding ranges for a year (or more). Thanks.
Here are the IPs that he has used recently:
--ValJor 20:40, 18 March 2011 (UTC),,,, belong to the same ISP. Thaberneiro used the same ISP too. But this ISP is large and they may be, well, different users. is unrelated (different country). If you want to check for open proxies, you can do it yourself. Ruslik 08:10, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Can you tell me how I can do it myself? Is there any documentation about it? Thanks.
--ValJor 09:25, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Oh, and by the way, here are two more users who are most probably the same vandal:
Please run the CU on them, too. Thanks.
--ValJor 12:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
  Likely Based on CU evidence all accounts (Thaberneiro, Taberneiro, Luka and Omem) as well as all IPs (except are likely to be the same user. Ruslik 13:13, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


  Unrelated Ruslik 08:29, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


  Confirmed Ngkayujustin and 跑得快 are the same user.   Unrelated Coolheaven and Somebodylikeyoulikeme are unrelated to each other and to the first user. Ruslik 07:56, 20 March 2011 (UTC)


  Confirmed all these accounts (registered and IPs) are the same user. Ruslik 15:54, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Bad ensane@fa.wikinews

The "User:Bad ensane" admitted that "User:Isis" is his/her own account, but now we are planning a new policy and we have a vote page for that, we should know how many other accounts he/she use to vote there, Thanks. Mjbmr Talk 12:58, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

  CheckUser is not for fishing. Unless you can show evidence of abusive use of multiple accounts (n:fa:User:Isis has no edits), this won't be fulfilled. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:44, 24 March 2011 (UTC)


Please, check this user. Thanks in advance.--George Talk 13:01, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Reviewing this request. -- Dferg ☎ talk 13:15, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Please do note that some accounts are already blocked, but I did not checked for how long they are.
Best regards, -- Dferg ☎ talk 18:57, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you very much.--George Talk 05:39, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Heldige Andreas@no.wikipedia

  Doing... -Barras 18:11, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Let's go:

  • Heldige Andreas (blocked)
  • Privat eiendom (blocked)
  • Electroshock (blocked)
  • Skiva (blocked)
  • Lars marius ryholt (blocked)
  • Latter (blocked)
  • Maxind (blocked)
  • Heldige sjefen (blocked)
  • Heldiggrisen (blocked)
  • Krikling (blocked)
  • Dåremi
  • Pioneer
  • Azur Theodor Le Sivert
  • Lelele (blocked)
  • Sex bæsj (blocked)

All users above share the same IP and UA. Following people used the same IP as above, but different UAs:

  • Disneyland Paris (blocked)
  • CounterStrike (blocked)
  • Jahn Teigen
  • Jan August Didriksen (blocked)
  • Sosperia (blocked)
  • Bjørn Johan Muri
  • Spektra

The following group share the same IP and UA.

  • Wiki1643
  • Steinsholm

However, the last group looks unrelated (different IP and different UA) to the first two groups. Those, marking as done and   Confirmed -Barras 18:37, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks again Barras! Finn Rindahl 19:11, 25 March 2011 (UTC)


  Confirmed Other socks are:
Ruslik 10:12, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much.--hyolee2/H.L.LEE 11:45, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

පසිදු කාවින්ද@si.wikipedia is this a correct IP? Ruslik 07:55, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
I am extremely sorry about the typo. It should be corrected as please. In the section "Reason" it is mentioned correctly please. --- ශ්වෙත 08:09, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
  Confirmed They are all the same user. Ruslik 08:30, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for speedy determination. --- ශ්වෙත 08:49, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

about sinchonji #2@ko.wikipedia

callitlove & cameback are   Likely the same user. the rest are   Unrelated Matanya 12:53, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
same result. Matanya 13:00, 27 March 2011 (UTC)


  Confirmed Ruslik 11:01, 28 March 2011 (UTC)