Open main menu
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in October 2009, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Contents

Requests

SpeedyGonzales@hr.wiki

The following discussion is closed.

Speedy was blocked by ArbCom desicion few days ago. At the new CU election, there is a user Kranjski, who is provoking candidates. It seams to be the same for me by insider knowlege, so I request a CU to request a block on hr.wiki for disturbing election. --Seha 09:03, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

  Unlikely --FiliP ██ 09:30, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Hvala :) --Seha 09:32, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nema na čemu :) --FiliP ██ 09:32, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

wikt:ja:User:橋頭保を破壊する etc.

The following discussion is closed.

Please check these accounts:

I think they are sockpuppets of EMPIS. Both are not blocked yet, and ガチヨッパラシーザー has edited only his userpage. But 橋頭保を破壊する has edited the article which another blocked user was going to edit. I suspect that he(EMPIS) is trying to confuse the administrative activities of JAwikt with acting as this blocked user. And also these username have been named in the same naming sense as EMPIS always does.--Mtodo 06:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

  Confirmed
wikt:ja:User:ガチヨッパラシーザー (used open proxy at 123.108.103.190)
  Unrelated
wikt:ja:User:橋頭保を破壊する
--თოგო (D) 09:04, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you, but this result has made me bothered a little. Mmmm. --Mtodo 03:22, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Voting on eml.wikipedia.org

The following discussion is closed.

Hello, I am , administrator and burocrat at eml.wikipedia.org. There has been, on september the 21st and 22nd, a massive attempt at on whether to split this wikipedia into two sites or not. I have currently extended the poll period (which was due to expire today) by one month. I would like to ask you to run a collective check-user on the following user names, most of which were registered very recently and have no contributions but for voting yes or no. Thank you, Tèstaquêdra 11:30, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

results:

  Confirmed socks:

group 1:

group 2:

  Likely socks:

group 1:

group 2:

Regards, LeinaD (t) 13:42, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Excuse me, it is not yet clear to me whether you have spotted two IP groups or four. In other words, are Arzdora77 and Samuelealbonetti likely socks of Sentruper etc., or do you mean that they are likely socks of each other? Tèstaquêdra 21:24, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Each group is a separate group of socks. Socks in "group 1" in "Confirmed socks" means that socks used the same IP and had the same UserAgent, socks in "group 1" in "Likely socks" means that socks used the same range/had similar UA. LeinaD (t) 08:57, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

LitroCvara@simplewiktionary

The following discussion is closed.

These users is part of a large amount of usernames that were created on many Wikis and were abusive on a few Wikis, and were automatically created on quite a few Wikis, and since they were abusive on other wikis, I want to check for both sleeper accounts on the Simple English Wiktionary, as well as a possibility to block the underlying IP address involved in this. Thanks, Razorflame 02:29, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

  Done, thanks. IPs globally blocked. There were no other accounts created by these IPs. --თოგო (D) 08:36, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Bajatvj, Sinar, 218.26.204.66@中文维基(zhwiki)

The following discussion is closed.

请检查下列用户。他们的破坏行为存在很大的共性。Please check these user. They had similar vandal. 我是中文維基百科的管理員,User:Bajatvj屢次不按照命名常規移動條目,多次胡亂合併、分割條目,無故刪除以及把條目改成地域中心內容,日前被封禁六個月。後來User:Sinar的編輯手法與此人極其相似,另有IP 218.26.204.66在本人用戶頁留言,立場與User:Bajatvj相同,並回退部份User:Bajatvj編輯過的條目至User:Bajatvj的版本,請幫忙檢查用戶,謝謝

I am the sysop on zh.wp. User:Bajatvj was blocked due to vandalism on moving page and adding a lot of own POV. User:Sinar have a very similar editing attitude as user Bajatvj, and becoming more active after User:Bajatvj's blocking. IP 218.26.204.66 left user message on me, while supporting User User:Bajatvj's acts, and roll back those articles to User:Bajatvj's version. Please help to check user. Thanks.

--Ws227 14:44, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

    •   Likely that Bajatvj==Sinar but   Inconclusive (tending toward   Unlikely in my view) whether either == 218.26.204.66 ... see also this wikistalk report. ++Lar: t/c 16:24, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm also the sysop on zh.wp and I would like to add another two suspicious accounts that are relevant to the issue above:

Please help to check user. Thanks. --Wcam 15:33, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Please note that the Bajatvj-Mokaw pair has been checked in Steward requests/Checkuser/2009-09. --Mewaqua 12:47, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you. And one more please:
  • Fololo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)--Wcam 09:53, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Anybody there? I need to ask for a new check user request of Sabb (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser). To see if he/she is Fololo aka. Bajatvj's puppet. Sabb was registed exactly 6 minutes after Fololo has been blocked by Wcam. And they both concerned on articles about the independence movements of Guangdong and Hongkong, and has published a lot of original research contents about them. Sabb and Fololo have also made some personal attacks point to me. For example: [1] (Here Sabb call me a communist who want to "harmonize" Chinese Wikipedia), [2].--PhiLiP 18:29, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
  Confirmed Sabb == Bajatvj etc  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 23:30, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:jv:User:Fdguiofdufdugf (Javanese Wikipedia)

The following discussion is closed.

Please check this account:

I suspect this user is a sockpuppet of Ice Age lover or the infamous Bambifan101. See also User:Fdguiofdufdugf. Thank you. Meursault2004 08:56, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

  Confirmed. Based on his sockpuppets at the Dutch Wikipedia this one is a sockpuppet as well. --Erwin 10:45, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Meursault2004 14:45, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Wiktionary:pt:User:Joana Fénix (Portuguese wiktionary)

The following discussion is closed.

A little while ago I requested a verification on a number of possible sockpuppets of a very disruptive user at pt.wiktionary. The findings were absolutely conclusively and the community decided to ban him for life from our project. I went on to block all known and suspected puppets of this vandal and we had some peace for a while in our little corner of the wiki world.

However, in the last few days a new user showed up who displays some of the behaviours we identified with that puppet master. This user claims to be a woman, but her actions and words are suspiciously similar to those of the banned user. Therefore, I would like to request a checkuser on her. If she is another installment of that vandal, I intend to block her as well for life. Please help us out fight this trouble maker.

Thanks in advance.

--ValJor 00:21, 16 October 2009 (UTC) (Bureaucrat at pt.wiktionary)

  Likely, have a same domain and use same OS, but don't use same IPs. Alex Pereira falaê 12:54, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Maybe this could be checked against pt:wikt:User:Troll which he allegedly just used to edit our Village Pump. Malafaya 22:31, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
  Confirmed, including Joana Fénix. Obrigado, Malafaya. Alex Pereira falaê 01:24, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much Alex for your work and thanks André for your help.
I hope I won't have to come back here for more, but I'm not sure, this vandal has shown time and again that he just won't let go... :-)
--ValJor 08:24, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

eml:Wikipedia:Sondaggio-separazione-EML-RMG