Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in October 2009, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.
Speedy was blocked by ArbCom desicion few days ago. At the new CU election, there is a user Kranjski, who is provoking candidates. It seams to be the same for me by insider knowlege, so I request a CU to request a block on hr.wiki for disturbing election. --Seha 09:03, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
I think they are sockpuppets of EMPIS. Both are not blocked yet, and ガチヨッパラシーザー has edited only his userpage. But 橋頭保を破壊する has edited the article which another blocked user was going to edit. I suspect that he(EMPIS) is trying to confuse the administrative activities of JAwikt with acting as this blocked user. And also these username have been named in the same naming sense as EMPIS always does.--Mtodo 06:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you, but this result has made me bothered a little. Mmmm. --Mtodo 03:22, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Voting on eml.wikipedia.org
The following discussion is closed.
Hello, I am , administrator and burocrat at eml.wikipedia.org. There has been, on september the 21st and 22nd, a massive attempt at on whether to split this wikipedia into two sites or not. I have currently extended the poll period (which was due to expire today) by one month. I would like to ask you to run a collective check-user on the following user names,
most of which were registered very recently and have no contributions but for voting yes or no. Thank you, Tèstaquêdra 11:30, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Excuse me, it is not yet clear to me whether you have spotted two IP groups or four. In other words, are Arzdora77 and Samuelealbonetti likely socks of Sentruper etc., or do you mean that they are likely socks of each other? Tèstaquêdra 21:24, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Each group is a separate group of socks. Socks in "group 1" in "Confirmed socks" means that socks used the same IP and had the same UserAgent, socks in "group 1" in "Likely socks" means that socks used the same range/had similar UA. LeinaD(t) 08:57, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
These users is part of a large amount of usernames that were created on many Wikis and were abusive on a few Wikis, and were automatically created on quite a few Wikis, and since they were abusive on other wikis, I want to check for both sleeper accounts on the Simple English Wiktionary, as well as a possibility to block the underlying IP address involved in this. Thanks, Razorflame 02:29, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Done, thanks. IPs globally blocked. There were no other accounts created by these IPs. --თოგო(D) 08:36, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
I am the sysop on zh.wp. User:Bajatvj was blocked due to vandalism on moving page and adding a lot of own POV. User:Sinar have a very similar editing attitude as user Bajatvj, and becoming more active after User:Bajatvj's blocking. IP 220.127.116.11 left user message on me, while supporting User User:Bajatvj's acts, and roll back those articles to User:Bajatvj's version. Please help to check user. Thanks.
Anybody there? I need to ask for a new check user request of Sabb (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser). To see if he/she is Fololo aka. Bajatvj's puppet. Sabb was registed exactly 6 minutes after Fololo has been blocked by Wcam. And they both concerned on articles about the independence movements of Guangdong and Hongkong, and has published a lot of original research contents about them. Sabb and Fololo have also made some personal attacks point to me. For example:  (Here Sabb call me a communist who want to "harmonize" Chinese Wikipedia), .--PhiLiP 18:29, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
A little while ago I requested a verification on a number of possible sockpuppets of a very disruptive user at pt.wiktionary. The findings were absolutely conclusively and the community decided to ban him for life from our project. I went on to block all known and suspected puppets of this vandal and we had some peace for a while in our little corner of the wiki world.
However, in the last few days a new user showed up who displays some of the behaviours we identified with that puppet master. This user claims to be a woman, but her actions and words are suspiciously similar to those of the banned user. Therefore, I would like to request a checkuser on her. If she is another installment of that vandal, I intend to block her as well for life. Please help us out fight this trouble maker.
Thanks in advance.
--ValJor 00:21, 16 October 2009 (UTC) (Bureaucrat at pt.wiktionary)
Likely, have a same domain and use same OS, but don't use same IPs. Alex Pereirafalaê 12:54, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Maybe this could be checked against pt:wikt:User:Troll which he allegedly just used to edit our Village Pump. Malafaya 22:31, 16 October 2009 (UTC)