Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in September 2009, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.
The following discussion is closed.
I surmise ko:user:100범 and ko:user:판델라 are same person
The first reason is both are from Kyeong-sang-buk-do there aren't well-known korea wiki users from Kyeong-sang-buk-do him. Furthermore, Kyeongsangbuk-do is much smaller than Califolnia(about Califolnia 1/100)
Second, ko:user:100범 and ko:user:판델라 have same thinking. ko:user:100범 and ko:user:판델라 admire communist and they hate Democracy. For example, ko:user:100범 and ko:user:판델라 hate Democracy country such as South Korea. They hate Democracy political party named Min Joo Dang. ko:user:100범 and ko:user:판델라 hate Kim Dae Jung and No Mu Hyeon. Because Kim Dae Jung and No Mu Hyeon are famous person who resist communism dictator. Also ko:user:100범 and ko:user:판델라 admire communism dictator, named Park Jeong Hee.
Also ko:user:100범 and ko:user:판델라 hate woman and they hate feminist such feminist as Kim Dae Jung and No Mu Hyeon and foreign feminist.
3rd, ko:user:100범 and ko:user:판델라 valdalize Korea history same patterns. --Nartwarch8 02:00, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the additional detail, but I don't see that you've stated how these accounts are disruptive to the project. If they're not causing harm then there's no need to run a checkuser. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:51, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
I would have no problem sharing the IP range with an admin of nn.wiki in private for a block, there is only this user on that range who seems to make troubles. You can contact me via special:emailuser/Spacebirdy. Also I think these accounts probably all need a lock. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið(:> )=| 15:00, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
These three accounts are involved in inappropriate deletion request of articles based on the notability issue in some different times. As it is believed that the inappropriate deletion requests made by these three users are caused by the deletion of articles that they created, their actions can be seen as violation of "Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point". Based on this similar behavior, I would like to request a user check to confirm whether these three users are related. Thank you.--Altt311 05:24, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Unrelated No ip overlap, different cities and isps--Cspurrier 01:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
I suspect these users are sockpuppets of wikt:ja:User:風鈴. 風鈴 has been blocked because of dialogue refusal, while (s)he contributed against ja.wikt-local policies/guidelines. These 2 accounts did very similar contributions, that's why I request for CheckUser. Best regards, --Ninomy 00:50, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Similar in what way? Please also be clear about what the disruption to the project is. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 14:15, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
I guess he is talking about EMPIS/YUNA, who was vandalizing ja.wikt already multiple times in the past. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið(:> )=| 14:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Unlikely as no identical IPs are found among these three usernames.--Jusjih 00:40, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Please check zh:User:Wrote, if these user is sockpuppets of zh:User:KEIM. zh:User:KEIM is blocked now. KEIM used a more puppets , see this. I think this user really the same person , but we went to have more evidence sure that . Thank you.--Advisory 09:41, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Have there been previous checks on KEIM sockpuppetry? (Links please.) --თოგო(D) 09:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
The users geolocate to opposite sides of the planet, but the IPs I am seeing look like open proxies or compromised machines (though I can't check conclusively at present). I'll pass that along to someone else if I can find someone available & if not I'll do it later & note the results. For now, I'd tend to consider Wrote to be Unlikely unless the behavioural evidence is highly compelling, which I cannot judge.
Please check whether zh:User:Bajatvj and zh:User:Mokaw are sock puppet accounts of each other. Currently, both are blocked for 6 months and 1 month respectively. I suspect that the account Bajatvj@zhwp has been used to circumvent the block on Mokaw@zhwp in Sep 2009. This suspection is based on the following reasons:
Both accounts show some common interest in editing articles about TV programmes and Chinese culture. In particular, some articles like zh:反華 and zh:格微软件 had been edited by both accounts.
The "active periods" of both accounts suggest a link between them. The account Mokaw was created in zh.wikipedia.org on 1 Apr 2009, while Bajatvj was being blocked at that time. Bajatvj became active again after the block expired on June. Then Mokaw was blocked by some causes else. While the block on Mokaw expired on 16 Jul 2009, Bajatvj became dormant. Mokaw was blocked again on 2 Sep 2009, and then Bajatvj becomes active again, until got blocked on 14 Sep 2009.
Both accounts like to empty their own user_talk pages to remove notices and warnings from other users.
Both accounts show an interest in moving articles, usually without discussion.
Both accounts show an interest in adding "蔣介石 / 蔣中正" (i.e. en:Chiang Kai-shek) in "regional vocabulary conversion" in zh.wikipedia.org.
Bajatvj had been blocked in 2008 as the user was suspected to have used the sock puppet zh:User:大嘢 to circumvent block in 2007.