Steward requests/Checkuser/2009-06


Request checkuser for

The following discussion is closed.

I suspect that below accounts' owner is same user. Because the 1~4th accounts' name contain an abuse about some users, and all of accounts vandalize some users' page(especially Integral's user page) on a same period. Thus, I'd like to check below accounts and more accounts that are confirmed.

  1. User:Shut up, Integral and Kys951
  2. User:Beijing is f uck!
  3. User:닥쳐라, 인테그럴 씹새끼야.
  4. User:베이징, 인테그럴, 개마리, 알밤한대 젖 드셈
  5. User:...ds

--Albamhandae 08:40, 24 May 2009 (UTC)


  • BlackCarbon, 한국어 위키백과의 민주화를 위하여!, Backshoogyt, Shut up, Integral and Kys951, 닥쳐라, 인테그럴 씹새끼야.,는 쓰레기 사용자, ...ds, 백꼬리, S.BULLET. of Kaesong, Yourope, Special, Cailo, 리듬봇, 닥쳐라 총대야, RedMosQ, Shut up!, and 씨발새끼 are all the same user. Many of these users are already blocked.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 03:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Request Checkuser

The following discussion is closed.

i suspect these two accounts are sockpuppets to each other, they are blaming one user without fairness and misunderstanding what is going on. actually i am the usewr got blamed by these users.

they are blaming me in w:ko:위키백과토론:명예의 전당/등록취소:윤성현 and they are attacking because they think i blamed somebody actually i did not. also, when ohmyhead finished to write his opinion, and 힘 which was not in wikipedia for 6 days wrote his opinion in 2 minutes. [1] I think they were writing this on purpose, so i need your help to stop their blaming. thank you very much. -- Shyoon1 02:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

  Declined,   CheckUser is not for fishing  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:50, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Request Checkuser w:ko:user:윤성현

The following discussion is closed.

I suspect these two accounts are sockpuppets to each other, they were and are used two tickets in a vote.

Belows are reliable records:

Please note that Check-User is not intended to apply pressure on editors; or as a threat against another editor Kwj2772 () 15:09, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
I sure that this is direct threat of me, (윤성현) and i don't even know who is Hoyojamie well. and I am one of most active editors in ko.wikipedia, how i suppose to make another account? -- Shyoon1 23:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  Declined,   CheckUser is not for fishing  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:51, 27 May 2009 (UTC)


The following discussion is closed.

I think that below owner is same User. this users was vandalised on some user page.(especially Mintz0223's user page) moreover, These users has vandalised by delete Template.( [2]), Thus, Are these users Sockpuppet? Additionly, these account and more account that are Confirmed.

-- Zerostone5482 07:57, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

upper request is not suitable to CU. Drofdr 23:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
  Declined   CheckUser is not for fishing--Nick1915 - all you want 10:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

ko:user:윤성현 & ko:user:Av3037

The following discussion is closed.

Hello, I am a new user of wikimedia. But I know wiki very well because I heard on long time about wiki from friends of mine. I think they are same person. And, 'Av3037' open issue to block Underthesky. why, Underthesky did not hear from him. 'Av3037' gurding or defending '윤성현' and they are talked. It seems they are not one person. evidence of log in time.

They(He) signed lots of votes. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

And I think '윤성현' created many accounts to use in votes. please check arrounded users of sector with '윤성현'. Thank you. 고추장 09:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello, I am tending to   decline this request, because I have the feeling You are too deeply involved in this (calling others vandal on this page [3], without proof is maybe not a good idea), and because the request itself does bring forth too few reasons for a check, please either bring some difflinks which would approve a check or this request is closed. You may ask a sysop of Your trust to help You with the request if the problem here is just the language barrier. Thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 07:38, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Felixtse12, Cbenny123@zh.wikipedia

The following discussion is closed.

Felixtse12 is an account established long before his first edit recently, he is blocked due to several vandals to zh.wikipedia, including rv the copyvio template on his established articles and allegedly adding copyvio templates to some articles which are not copyvio.

Cbenny123 is an account established after the block of Felixtse12. He described himself as a schoolmate of Felixtse12, and helped the blocked Felixtse12 to make appeals. But I suspect Cbenny123 is Felixtse12's sockpuppet, hoping to get around the blockage. In view of this, I request a checkuser to see if these two accounts are related. Thank you very much!--Altt311 08:54, 27 May 2009 (UTC)


  Likely that

are the same user,

best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:40, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your help!-- 19:56, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Marco9673, 更正專家, 黃子@zh.wikipedia

The following discussion is closed.

The first two users are editing the same article (w:zh:港鐵Rotem電動列車) of same style, making unnecessary style changes. And 更正專家 moves articles which violates the naming criteria, causing disruption to zh.wikipedia. The last two users are apparently related, as they edited each others' user page (indeed they use it as sandbox).

Therefore, I would like to request a usercheck to know if these three accounts are related. Thank you very much!--Altt311 09:11, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

  It looks like a duck to me--Nick1915 - all you want 10:33, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your help!--Altt311 13:13, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Chia-heng, Chia-henglu and Danlo @ zh.wikipedia

The following discussion is closed.

The three accounts stated above are under block status, and Chia-henglu are now indef blocked. All three accounts share the same editing behavior (establishing articles without filtering the information and continuously removing the editing templates posted by other users), which disturbed the operation of zh.wikipedia. Also, if these accounts are related, then this user may go around the block by using other accounts, which is not allowed.

To ensure my analysis of the edit records is correct, I would like to request a check about the relationship between these three accounts. Thank you.--Altt311 13:12, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

  Confirmed all accounts are related, no further sockpuppet--Nick1915 - all you want 15:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your help!--Altt311 17:31, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Vandal at

The following discussion is closed.
Status:    Done

Dear colleagues!

I'm unsure that it's a correct place for my request, but I don't know a better one.

The recently created site is under attack of vandal.

There are numerous articles created, all of them are containing the same information.

I don't really need checkuser information - the vandal uses an open proxy at address

But we need to do something to stop this. As I mentioned above, the site is just opened, with there are no admins/oversights there.

The vandal discloses personal information, and all the "articles" created by him should be oversighted.

Any advice is appreciated. Thank you!

Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 01:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Update: CBrown says that the issue is handled. Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 01:06, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

The vandal came to Meta as well: :-( Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 01:36, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Links on vandal contribs: first, second and third. – Innv | d | s: 03:44, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

And please check information of this vandal accounts and inform to User:DR (checkuser at ru.wikipedia) for comparison with information of other users. 04:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello,   Done, please have a look at the ml. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 08:57, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Vandal using open proxies at vi.wp

The following discussion is closed.

They appear to be socks using open proxies. This vandal abused vi.wp to talk obscenity. Please block the open proxies involved. Thanks. Tmct 08:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

The following accounts seems to belong to that same person:

The full list is here. The pattern has been repeating for several days with a little more than 24 hours in between (the time during which the IPs are blocked together with the accounts). Thanks for your help. Tmct 08:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC)


  Confirmed socks:

Please note, that I did not check if the currently blocked accounts are blocked indefinit. Also the so called "full list" You linked is just a link to the blocklog, I did not check every account that was blocked on, only those listed here.

Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:26, 6 June 2009 (UTC)


The following discussion is closed.

ko:user:Unypoly in ko.wikipedia, Unypoly is still disrupting with his many sockpuppets and he uses sockpuppet to unblock his main account, Unypoly. also, he uses his sockpuppet that he is not related with Unypoly, but it is nonsense. And some accounts that does similar things as Unypoly like ko:user:ohmyhead, ko:user:underthesky are vandaling and trolling like attacking other users.

i think i am pretty sure they have related. i dont here for request to block somebody, but i and many users in ko.wikipedia want to make sure how Unypoly made many sockpuppets. so find them please. -- Shyoon1 23:41, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello, the account "UnyPoly" does not exist on ko.wikipedia (see text in red). Please check Your spelling, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 23:34, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
i am sorry, it was Unypoly -- Shyoon1 23:41, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello, sorry but this account is too old to check (last contributions too long ago), this can't be done, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 23:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
then can you find a list of ohmyhead and Underthesky? i am sure ohmyhead and underthesky is somebody's sockpuppet, but i dont know who is that. (like they argue they are newbie, but they are too professional so i think they disguise as newbie.) -- Shyoon1 23:49, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I am sorry, but since 1. having multiple accounts is not forbidden (unless abused) and 2. saying to be a newbie but having more experience is not abuse I would   decline this request, thanks for Your understanding, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 09:21, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
no, but they are trolling and attacking even if they are newbie. but they dont even have some kind of manner,

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shyoon1 (talk) diff, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 07:23, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

shyoon1 is a high school student. And he is one of famous boy. No manner boy in I think we must check truth of him. please. Ignore all requests from him before result is not guilty. Thanks. --고추장 00:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Ok, please stop this, we decide which requests are declined, and a declined request is no big deal, we just check if it falls into the policy, which is our job. Still I do not see what bad things these users did that would require a check, so either bring forth some proof (difflinks to vandalism) or this request is closed. No discussions or insults here! --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 07:23, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

this is the proof [6]

in this, 고추장 (i think this is Unypoly) that says i am a liar, and go back to your mama like that. this is insulting to me and my parents. this is definitely trolling, so please check that. -- Shyoon1 21:59, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

An insult is not reason to believe that the user is sockpupetting, thus not reason to run a check.   CheckUser is not for fishing - this request is   Declined  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 22:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

P.S. I have warned 고추장 for making personal attacks already, if he continues he will just be blocked, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 22:58, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

wikt:ja:User:GJJJJJ etc.

The following discussion is closed.

Please check these 2 accounts.

Their comments at Request for varification (nearly equal to request for deletion) are similar to EMPIS's or his sockpuppet's. Plus, I thought these 2 comments seem to multi-voting or propaganda maneuvers to keep an article of a slang, illegal use of multiaccounts. Thank you. --Ninomy 15:47, 13 June 2009 (UTC)


  Confirmed socks of EMPIS:

  Confirmed socks of YUNA:

(note: (blocked= currently blocked account, not unified = no global account) I did not check for how long they are blocked.)

Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 16:08, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your work. Best regards, --Ninomy 16:11, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Please check 2 more accounts: wikt:ja:User:バリモフニセイ, wikt:ja:User:ツギヨッパラシーザー, whether they are same as EMPIS and use any proxies. Request reason is the same as former one. --Ninomy 11:17, 14 June 2009 (UTC)(added.--Ninomy 12:30, 14 June 2009 (UTC))


  Confirmed socks: EMPIS:

(note, I did not check for how long they are blocked).

Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 20:17, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

multiple accounts Check Requests

The following discussion is closed.

ko:user:윤성현(user:Shyoon1) and ko:user:Av3037. I am suspicious these accounts are same, so can youfigure it out? --cho M.cher 11:46, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

  Declined, no valid reason given for a check, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 20:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

User K_Lastochka

The following discussion is closed.

Is a legitimate user on several wiki versions including wiki-en but a cross wiki vandal recently opened up fake impersonating accounts and created the user page with a horrible text. Speedy deletes are placed already by a colleague and I renamed the account on wiki-nl but I think it would be wise to have a cu check and global block for the underlying IP-addresses if possible. Fake accounts appeared on wiki-de wikinews-en wiktionary-en wiki-es, wiki-fi, wiki-nl, wiktionary-fr wikipedia-ja and wikipedia-pt the vandal has created them sofar tonight. See Kind regards and thank you. MoiraMoira 20:11, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

  Done, thanks for reporting, the user would do good to activate sul for himself. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:08, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


The following discussion is closed.

Their comments at talk. Plus, I thought these 4 comments seem to multi-voting maneuvers to support an dameged of 명예의 전당(Hall of Fame), illegal use of multiaccounts. Thank you.--hyolee2/H.L.LEE 23:52, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

(+1) They claim they are friends, but they only appear when specific user(w:ko:User:윤성현) is on vote. And their behavior seems to be a cyber-stalking. If they are one same person, I will request local admins to ban their accounts. adidas 06:13, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello, please can You explain what exactly the users did besides saying they were friends, a request of these was just denied shortly before, I don't think this one falls into the policy either. Please can someone explain the abusive usage of the accounts with difflinks to the abuse that had been made, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 20:50, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
  • [7] - 고추장, 힘 and Cs claimed to be friends.
  • [8] - 힘 did no edits for some days. Suddenly, he appeared and left an opinion on 'Hall of Fame'. [9]. Before that, most of 힘's edits were talking with Cs and 고추장. Cs suddenly appeared after some minutes and left an insincere message. [10] 고추장(also had no edits for days) did the same thing.
  • [11] Underthesky opened the vote for the confidence to the 'featured articles committee' member user:shyoon1. He left numerous opinions against those who support shyoon1. In Jun 8, [12] Underthesky added an opinion and just after that, [13] 'Beauty' appeared and said 'I support the opinion of Underthesky'. It was just his 6th edit on ko.wikipedia.(Other 5 edits include one 'very minor edit' and 4 'opinions'. Ordinary edits were none.
  • Vote for 'Featured Articles Committee' - [14] 고추장 unexpectedly showed up and left a message against user:Shyoon1. Almost the same time, [15] 힘 left almost the same opinion. The time when 고추장 and 힘 left their opinion was Jun 8 21:00.(Note that Beauty's edit was at 18:53 and underthesky's edit was at 18:47
  • If 고추장, 힘, Cs, Underthesky and Beauty are just one same person, their opinions will be a 'disruption' on ko.wikipedia. adidas 15:56, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
  Declined, delcine reason: I am sorry, but I don't see the abusive behaviour, claiming to be friends can hardly be called abuse, if they are disruptive, just block them, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 20:25, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
I have showed you that they are related(or one same person) and keep attacking a specific user. It should be clear whether they are sockpuppets or not. If they are one same person, it will be a kind of vote-stacking with abusive multi-accounts. Thanks. adidas 00:19, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
I agree to declining this request. Voting against someone does not mean that they are the same person. Sorry but I don't see a reason for a checkuser here. CU is something that intrudes the privacy of users and should therefore only be done if there is no other way. In your case, if they attack other users by insults or harrassment, just block them. If you think they are the same person, make it plausible. You can also block users who are only discussing or voting since that is not the goal of the project. If you have problems on with users who vote after only 5 edits or such, make a voting eligibility rule, like that only users with more than 200 edits in the article namespace may vote or something like that. --თოგო (D) 20:34, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

wikt:it:user:Bess @itwikt

The following discussion is closed.

Please check wikt:it:user:Bess, he seems to be a sockpuppet of a blocked infinite user called wikt:it:user:Red Women --Diuturno 19:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Why do you think so? --თოგო (D) 19:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
IRC conversations, same interests and same mudus operandi--Wim b 21:24, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Wim b expressed perfectly why we think so--Diuturno 10:36, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Hm, ok. After a talk to Melos on IRC I decided to run the check. The outcome is: (very)   Likely they are the same user, although I can't definitely confirm it, because they have no parallel editing times as you know. --თოგო (D) 11:08, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Thogo, I really appreciate your help. --Diuturno 11:27, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

zh:user:Elknz,zh:user:Lbydmn,zh:User:Kpedc,zh:User:Aueak,zh:User:文建,zh:user:KEIM @zhwiki

The following discussion is closed.

Please check zh:user:Elknz,zh:user:Lbydmn,zh:User:Kpedc,zh:User:Aueak,zh:User:文建,zh:user:KEIM , Their contribution is identical.Moreover, they had big disputes or arguments over many Korea's historical problems(edit war).I think this is very suspected. Thank you.--Advisory 16:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

the possible log in ip for this user is, which is located somewhere in States. Georgezhao 20:04, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

some similar user from en wiki,en:User:Historiographer,en:User:KoreanSentry,en:User:Aueak . the second English user send me a warning when i made a correction before, please check [16]. thanks. Georgezhao 20:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

two more here,zh:用户:KEIMS, zh:用户:Ekatak,thanks. Georgezhao 22:55, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello, sorry, but since no evicence is brought forward, I would tend to   decline this request, because   CheckUser is not for fishing. Having big disputes or arguments and edit waring is even an evidence that they are not the same user... Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 20:30, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello, ok,   Doing... this per [17], reason: suspected accounts are editwaring with other users/ POV-pushing. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 20:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

List of users with last contributions too old to run a check:


  Possible socks:

Please check their contributions and only block them if they were used abusively.

Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 20:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC)