Requests for new languages/Wiktionary Iloko

Iloko Wiktionary

←main page

Requests for new languages (Wiktionary Iloko)

submitted verification final decision This proposal has been closed as part of a reform of the request process. This request has not necessarily been rejected, and new requests are welcome. This decision was taken by the language committee in accordance with the Language proposal policy. The closing committee member provided the following comment: This discussion was created before the implementation of the Language proposal policy, and it is incompatible with the policy. Please open a new proposal in the format this page has been converted to (see the instructions). Do not copy discussion wholesale, although you are free to link to it or summarise it (feel free to copy your own comments over). —{admin} Pathoschild 02:22, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Proposal summary
Language details: Iloko (Iloko, ilo ISO 639) Editing community: Joemaza (P) List your user name if you're interested in editing the wiki. Add "N" next to your name if you are a native speaker of this language. Relevant pages: — External links: GUMIL Filipinas
Please read the handbook for requesters for help using this template correctly.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

• Comment: This wiktionary was already requested and the proposal has already been approved. The earlier request can be found at the Approved requests for new languages subpage. The only thing that's being awaited is for developers to create the wiktionary. --Harvzsf 02:16, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • The problem though is that no one has bothered to make a version in the Incubator. I left qualms about this and similarly-fated projects in the Philippine regional notice board. As long as there's no version that can be used to create such a project (such is the case with the new Chavacano and Pangasinan Wikipedias and the Bosnian Wikinews), it might not be created at all. --Sky Harbor 14:05, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.