Open main menu

Requests for new languages/Wikiversity Turkish

Turkish WikiversityEdit

See also the second request (open).
main page Requests for new languages (Wikiversity Turkish)
submitted verification final decision
  This proposal has been closed as part of a reform of the request process.
This request has not necessarily been rejected, and new requests are welcome. This decision was taken by the language committee in accordance with the Language proposal policy.

The closing committee member provided the following comment:

This discussion was created before the implementation of the Language proposal policy, and it is incompatible with the policy. Please open a new proposal in the format this page has been converted to (see the instructions). Do not copy discussion wholesale, although you are free to link to it or summarise it (feel free to copy your own comments over). —{admin} Pathoschild 02:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Proposal summary
  • Language details: Turkish (Türkçe, tur ISO639-3)
  • Editing community: —
    List your user name if you're interested in editing the wiki. Add "N" next to your
    name if you are a native speaker of this language.
  • Relevant pages: —
  • External links:
Please read the handbook for requesters for help using this template correctly.

There should be a turkish version too.I think it will be nice. Necrocapo.

SupportEdit

  1. Support I think I can add too many things.At least we can translate the other pages.Please define your opinion here. Necrocapo
  2. Support For sure --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 10:47, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  3. Support Definitely Baristarim 05:17, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  4. Support I am agree with you EAN 08:33, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  5. Support --AlefZet 21:00, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  6. Support --Mskyrider 07:59, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  7. Support --Turks are doing well with the Wikipediya and other sister projects, so this one wouldn't be an exception.
  8. Support (sorta). I feel it is a bit premature for this since all tr. projects are under developed atm but on the long run this should be fine. -- Cat chi? 17:48, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  9. Support --Absar 11:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  10. Support --Sallapattias 19:09, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

OpposeEdit