Requests for new languages/Wikiversity Finnish

Finnish Wikiversity

←main page

Requests for new languages (Wikiversity Finnish)

submitted verification final decision This proposal has been closed as part of a reform of the request process. This request has not necessarily been rejected, and new requests are welcome. This decision was taken by the language committee in accordance with the Language proposal policy. The closing committee member provided the following comment: This discussion was created before the implementation of the Language proposal policy, and it is incompatible with the policy. Please open a new proposal in the format this page has been converted to (see the instructions). Do not copy discussion wholesale, although you are free to link to it or summarise it (feel free to copy your own comments over). —{admin} Pathoschild 02:36, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Proposal summary
Language details: Finnish (suomi, fin ISO639-3) Editing community: — List your user name if you're interested in editing the wiki. Add "N" next to your name if you are a native speaker of this language. Relevant pages: — External links: —
Please read the handbook for requesters for help using this template correctly.

Support

1. Support --Purodha Blissenbach 16:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
2. Support --Icepenguin 12:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
3. Support --Tigru 15:56, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

1. The same what Derbeath said about Polish Wikiversity. Finnish Wikibooks lacks of users and there is maybe one or two finished books. And quality is low. I don't see where we need Wikiversity and how it differs from Wikibook. Linnea 19:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
2. Oppose --Kompak 20:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
3. Oppose, I think there's no enough contributors. --15:26, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
4. I contribute in fi.wikibooks (Wikikirjasto) and I see that books can for the moment be worked on in Wikikirjasto - and even then there aren't enough editors. -Samulili 16:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
5. Oppose --Alfred Dengan 13:26, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
6. I'd love to see this started in the future, but the most rational thing is to get this started in WB and if things look good, progress with the WV. --Jannex 19:42, 24 September 2006 (UTC)