Requests for new languages/Wikibooks Cebuano

See also: Requests for new languages/Wikibooks Cebuano 2 (verified as eligible)

Cebuano Wiktionary and WikibooksEdit

main page Requests for new languages (Wikibooks Cebuano)
submitted verification final decision
  This proposal has been closed as part of a reform of the request process.
This request has not necessarily been rejected, and new requests are welcome. This decision was taken by the language committee in accordance with the Language proposal policy.

The closing committee member provided the following comment:

This discussion was created before the implementation of the Language proposal policy, and it is incompatible with the policy. Please open a new proposal in the format this page has been converted to (see the instructions). Do not copy discussion wholesale, although you are free to link to it or summarise it (feel free to copy your own comments over). —{admin} Pathoschild 02:03:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Proposal summary
Please read the handbook for requesters for help using this template correctly.

Hi all,

With the "success" of the Cebuano Wikipedia (with 790 pages in under six months), I, in behalf of the Cebuano Wikipedia community and the Cebuano people, would like to request for a wiktionary and a wikibook in Cebuano.

--Bentong Isles 12:50, 5 December 2005 (UTC) (Bureaucrat, Cebuano Wikipedia)

  • Number of speakers: 28 million (18 million first-language, 10 million second-language)
  • Locations spoken: central and southern Philippines
  • Related languages: Hiligaynon, Waray, Tagalog
  • Strongly Support----Harvzsf 17:32, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --Chris 19:08, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Support!--Nino Gonzales (N) 14:23, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Arbeo 20:30, 10 December 2005 (UTC) (I think we can just wave this through for there is a successful Wikipedia in that language already.)
  • Support --Taichi - (あ!) 05:48, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --ILVI 05:01, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Support, but, imho, one or two sysops have to be immediatly appointed after creation, to fight spam. I would be disappointed if those new wikis begin as "spamnests" like so many other beginning wikis. :o) Hégésippe | ±Θ± 19:10, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
  • strongly support themoomin
  • Support Joemaza 07:13, 27 October 2006 (UTC)