Requests for comment/Use the Wikipedia brand for all projects

The following request for comments is closed. no traction as a proposal

I have seen this being brought up many times, from Wiktionary logo !votes to the Knowledge Engine FAQ. The idea: extend the "Wikipedia" brand to cover all sister projects (Wikipedia Dictionary, Wikipedia Textbooks, Wikipedia Quotes, etc.). The URLs would be straightforward: en.dictionary.wikipedia.org, jbo.textbooks.wikipedia.org, simple.travelguide.wikipedia.org, etc. I would also propose creating/reopening a full set of sisterprojects for every existing Wikipedia, and creating projects in every language with translation files in the Mediawiki software (en-gb, en-ca, avk, etc.). Lojbanist (talk) 02:46, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For what purpose? – Ajraddatz (talk) 03:42, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Or use the Wikimedia brand for all projects?

https://www.wikimedia.org - Exists!
- https://books.wikimedia.org
- https://commons.wikimedia.org - Exists!
- https://dict.wikimedia.org
- https://data.wikimedia.org
- https://foundation.wikimedia.org
- https://incubator.wikimedia.org - Exists!
- https://meta.wikimedia.org - Exists!
- https://news.wikimedia.org
- https://source.wikimedia.org
- https://species.wikimedia.org - Exists!
- https://travel.wikimedia.org

77.179.247.196 06:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion edit

Strong oppose we should do the opposite and support more the sister projects, otherwise they will just become secondary services of WP in people's heads. --CreativeC (talk) 13:03, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose. Vulp here 03:03, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]