Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Quechua Wikibooks

The result of the following proposal for closing a WMF project is to CLOSE the project. Please, do not modify this page.

The following discussion is closed: Closed. No recent activity, no content at all — VasilievVV 16:43, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to close this discussion in seven days from now, on May 11 — VasilievVV 19:45, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

support for deletion

Support no content (b:qu:Special:Allpages) and no recent useful activity (b:qu:Special:Recentchanges) --A. B. ^(talk) 14:43, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support it has had more than two years, and there is still no useful content or any signs of positive activity. --Jorunn 22:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Don't matter if the other project in same language have articles; this don't have. — Slade ♠ 21:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Even though I don't speak Quechua, I think this project should remain. Its sister project Wikipidiya has achieved almost 4000 articles with more than six active users. It just needs a push.--Fluence, 21:02 12 September 2007 (UTC-5)
Oppose Ack Fluence. I'm an active user of Quechua Wikipidiya, not of Quechua Wikibook, but I can imagine I'd once participate there as well. The Quechua projects are growing rapidly, just wait some months.--AlimanRuna, 10:49 13 September 2007 (UTC-5)

I have registered at qu:wikibooks now (AlimanRuna) and started translating the Main Page. -- AlimanRuna 10:45, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I'm an active use of the Wikipidiya, too. As AlimanRuna and Fluence said, the projects are growing... (the Wikipidiya & (the Wikisimitaqi), now the encyclopedia has more than 4000 articles and is the biggest in a native american language; so we can expect soon the use of Quechua Wikibooks! =)--Kanon6917 20:57, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Thank you, Fluence! - As an active user of the Quechua Wikipidiya I am quite sure that it is just a matter of time until the Quechua Wikibooks are filled with life. Just give us a bit of time. Thanks. -- CaTi0604 20:50, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I see there are a lot of interested Qeuchua-users who can edit the Wikibooks. Give it more time. --Ooswesthoesbes 06:10, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Apparently relevant content, and recent activity. --Coppertwig 20:16, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relevant content? I don't see any. -- Prince Kassad 17:45, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]