Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Aromanian Wiktionary

< Proposals for closing projects

The result of the following proposal for closing a WMF project is to KEEP the project. Please, do not modify this page.

The following discussion is closed: Project kept —Dferg (talk) 17:36, 12 April 2009 (UTC) [reply]

The Aromanian Wiktionary has no legitimate content and no activity apart from spam cleanup. -- Prince Kassad 16:37, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to close this discussion in one week from now. —Dferg (talk) 09:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No consensus to close the project: KEPT —Dferg (talk) 17:36, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support closure

  1. Support closure: no content (wikt:roa-rup:Special:Allpages) and no useful activity other than spam clean-up (wikt:roa-rup:Special:Recentchanges)--A. B. (talk) 17:02, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Per nomination. Also extremely poor localisation (7%). Siebrand 16:05, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support --Ilaria 07:02, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support - not enough content. macy 21:54, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Support - At 31/12/2008 the lastest activity were on 25/12/2008 (2 edits of WikimediaNotifierBot). There is no activity. Dferg (T-ES) 11:25, 31 December 2008 (UTC) I change my vote —Dferg (meta-w:es.) 22:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]
    Comment Comment One week's span (and in Xmas time) is enough to say that there is not activity in a project? XDDD. --79.78.74.38 18:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC) ... Please note I crossed off the last bit of my comment in a previous edition. I deeply regret having put it, I should have never done it. --79.78.74.38 01:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose closure

  1. Oppose ...There are not many aromanians. They need more time to complete their dictionary.
  2. I am Aromanian ... but I can not edit the page. It was locked - why? Somebody please unlock it; I'll do my best.
  3. Oppose. There is recent activity, including three new pages as well as edits to other pages. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 00:55, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. See my talk page for further details —Dferg (meta-w:es.) 22:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose. Holder 08:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose, it has content activity, if it is closed there will be none of course, so keep it open and allow it to grow slowly! --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 10:42, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Oppose. The Aromanian language is a relatively small language. It will take time to develop, closing the project prematurely would not help anybody. Wikimedia should encourage cultural diversity, and there are readers interested in the results. Stranger, 10 April 2009.
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Aromanian_Wiktionary&oldid=1911812"