This page is a translated version of the page Ombudsman commission and the translation is 43% complete.
Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Cymraeg • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Esperanto • ‎Lëtzebuergesch • ‎Nederlands • ‎Ripoarisch • ‎Sunda • ‎Tagalog • ‎Tiếng Việt • ‎Türkçe • ‎Zazaki • ‎asturianu • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎euskara • ‎français • ‎italiano • ‎lietuvių • ‎magyar • ‎occitan • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎română • ‎slovenčina • ‎suomi • ‎svenska • ‎čeština • ‎български • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎հայերեն • ‎עברית • ‎العربية • ‎سنڌي • ‎فارسی • ‎پښتو • ‎नेपाली • ‎বাংলা • ‎தமிழ் • ‎తెలుగు • ‎മലയാളം • ‎ไทย • ‎မြန်မာဘာသာ • ‎中文 • ‎日本語 • ‎粵語 • ‎한국어

Ombudsmanskommissionen undersöker klagomål om brott mot sekretesspolicyn, policyn om tillgång till icke offentlig information, IP-kontrollantspolicyn och censurpolicyn för Board of Trustees. De undersöker även om lokala policyer och riktlinjer om IP-kontrollanter or censorer följer dem globala policyerna om IP-kontrollanter och censorer.



In addition to official investigation, they will mediate between the complainant and the respondent (usually a CheckUser, oversighter, Bureaucrat, Administrator, or arbitration committee member). When legally necessary, the ombudsman will assist the General Counsel, the Executive Director or the board in handling the case.

When the case is litigious, the ombudsman will be in charge of educating CheckUsers or others about the Foundation's privacy policy. When the Privacy Policy, Access to Nonpublic Information Policy, CheckUser Policy, or Oversight policy have been breached, the Ombudsman Commission should report to the Executive Director or designated staff and recommend a course of action (such as removal of access to tools). Additionally, the commission might suggest suitable changes to policies or software.


An ombudsman's investigation should be conducted in a manner determined by the ombudsman to ensure fairness and impartiality. As a general guideline, it is best that ombudsmen avoid conflicts of interest as much as possible, particularly by avoiding routine use of CheckUser or oversight access and not processing complaints on the projects on which they are very active editors. However, matters that come before the commission are not clearcut, and the language and culture of various projects may pose barriers to outsiders. As such, how the commission investigates complaints is left to the discretion of its appointed members.


Begäran om ombudsmän kan göras till följande e-postadress (gärna på ett språk som talas av en eller fler medlemmar):



Members of the ombudsman commission are selected by Wikimedia Foundation officials from the Wikimedia community. A call for volunteers is issued each year in early December on the Wikimedia-L mailing list and on the talk page of this policy, as well as other project forums as appropriate. They are appointed (assuming they agree) for a period of approximately one year. An ombudsman's real identity must be disclosed to the Foundation legal counsel. A non-voting alternate member may be appointed to serve for one year, with an expectation for a seat as a full member the following year.

Tilldelade rättigheter

Ombudsmen har följande rättigheter globalt:

  • Search deleted pages (browsearchive)
  • Check users' IP addresses and other information (checkuser)
  • View the checkuser log (checkuser-log)
  • View deleted history entries, without their associated text (deletedhistory)
  • View deleted text and changes between deleted revisions (deletedtext)
  • View private logs (suppressionlog)
  • View revisions hidden from any user (viewsuppressed)

Current ombudsman users

See also automatically generated list (terms expire februari 2021):

Previous ombudsmen

februari 2019 — februari 2020:

februari 2018 — februari 2020:

februari 2017 — februari 2020:

  • Góngora from cawiki, eswiki (februari 2017 — februari 2019)
  • Krd from dewiki, commonswiki
  • Lankiveil from enwiki (februari 2017 — april 2018)
  • Richwales from enwiki (februari 2017 — februari 2018)
  • Vogone from wikidata, dewiki, metawiki (februari 2017 — februari 2018)

februari 2016 — februari 2019:

  • Alan from commonswiki (februari 2016 — februari 2018)
  • NahidSultan from bnwiki, commonswiki (februari 2016 — februari 2017)
  • Pajz from dewiki (februari 2016 — februari 2019)

februari 2015 — februari 2018:

  • Alhen from eswiki (februari 2015 — februari 2017)
  • Barras from simplewiki, metawiki (februari 2015 — november 2016)
  • PhilKnight from enwiki (februari 2015 — februari 2017)
  • Rubin16 from ruwiki

februari 2014 — februari 2018:

  • Avraham from enwiki (februari 2014 — februari 2016)
  • Gnom from dewiki from itwiki (februari 2014 — februari 2017)
  • M7 from itwiki (februari 2014 — juni 2014)
  • Polimerek from plwiki
  • Stryn from fiwiki, wikidatawiki (februari 2014 — juli 2014)

februari 2013 — februari 2017:

  • Deskana from enwiki (februari 2013 — september 2013)
  • Erzbischof from dewiki (februari 2013 — februari 2014)
  • Huji from fawiki
  • Levg from ruwiki (februari 2013 — februari 2015)

februari 2011 — februari 2016:

  • Dweller from enwiki (april 2011 — februari 2013)
  • FloNight from enwiki (april 2011 — februari 2014)
  • Herbythyme from commonswiki (februari 2011 — april 2011)
  • Mwpnl from nlwiki (februari 2011 — februari 2013)
  • Pundit from plwiki (april 2011 — februari 2012)
  • Sir48 from dawiki (februari 2011 — februari 2015)
  • Thogo from dewiki

februari 2010 — februari 2011:

januari 2009 — februari 2010:

december 2007 — januari 2009:

juli 2006 — december 2007:


User:Uzoma OzurumbaUser:AjraddatzUser:Wikilover90User:GalahadUser:EVinenteUser:EmufarmersUser:DeltaQuadUser:TelesUser:SaileshpatUser:Jamie TubersUser:ElmacenderesiUser:Dyolf77User:BillinghurstUser:VogoneUser:RichwalesUser:LankiveilUser:KrdUser:GóngoraUser:TaketaUser:PajzUser:NahidSultanUser:AlanUser:PhilKnightUser:AlhenUser:Rubin16User:BarrasUser:StrynUser:M7User:AvrahamUser:PolimerekUser:GnomUser:LevgUser:ErzbischofUser:DeskanaUser:HujiUser:PunditUser:DwellerUser:ThogoUser:Sir48User:MwpnlUser:HerbythymeUser:FloNightUser:PalnatokeUser:LarUser:ElianUser:DRUser:CarkuniUser:TinzUser:ShizhaoUser:SchisteUser:Sam KornUser:PatríciaRUser:RebeccaUser:MackensenUser:Hei berUser:WeggeUser:UninvitedCompanyUser:Cartman02au 


Please follow these guidelines when submitting an inquiry to the commission:

  1. Be concise. Lengthy emails with unnecessary information make it harder for the commission to process the case in a timely manner.
  2. Be objective. Avoid making inquiries based on speculations or subjective judgements.
  3. Provide evidence. Please provide us with diff links and/or permanent links when possible.
  4. Be specific. Specify what part of which policy has been violated.
  5. Please inform us if your wiki has an Arbitration Committee (or a similar committee) and if you have reached them (or used other dispute resolution procedure customary to your community) before reaching the Ombudsman Commission. Provide a link to the relevant case page if appropriate.


Fall som får vår uppmärksamhet kommer behandlas på följande vis:

  1. Confirmation of the request: we will send a notice of confirmation to the requester, and if necessary ask for further information.
  2. Scope: if the request is within the scope of the ombudsman commission, we will do the investigation, if not we will decline the request and try to direct the complainor to a better place to get help for his/her individual problem.
  3. Investigation: We do whatever is necessary to find out whether or not there was a breach of the policies or a non-compliance or conflict of local policies with the global ones.
  4. Result: We give the result of our investigation to the requester, and if there was indeed a breach of the privacy policy, we will inform the user who was investigated and if necessary inform the Board of Trustees and if necessary recommend removing CU or steward rights from the user breaking the policy.

Se även

Reports of the commission


Andra dokument