Movement roles project/Accountability basics

Accountabilities of each Wikimedia movement group or entity

Wikimedia groups and entities are accountable TO:

the part of the movement that they are trying to support (e.g. Wikimedians in Ruritania, even if they are not explicitly members)
the rest of the Wikimedia movement (e.g. to the Wikimedia Foundation board)
their broader community (e.g. the people and government of Ruritania)
their members (e.g. the members of Wikimedia Ruritania)

Wikimedia groups and entities are accountable FOR:

adhering to the shared principles of the movement outlined above
helping the movement towards its goals
fulfilling roles and responsibilities agreed with the worldwide movement
managing the resources (e.g., trademarks, money, goodwill of the movement) that the movement grants them
governing themselves in a manner that maximizes accountability to those the group or entity is accountable to
accounting publicly for funds received and used
stating publicly the planned actions in an annual plan and budget
stating publicly what they did, documenting their activities
ensuring activities are ethical and legal

Mechanisms for enabling accountability:

Public reporting: local and global
Annual plans and budgets
Reports on activities
Reports on changes in governance
Timely annual reports of financial accounts (audited for organizations of a certain size)
Pro-active reporting on problems/issues encountered

Review body(ies) that address problems with organizations??

Role of WMF Board and staff (as counterparty for agreements between Wikimedia and affiliated organizations)??
Need for a movement committee to address problems

NB: There are related ideas in the draft charter

Correlating work to roles that have been agreed upon with the movement (e.g.,WMF's role to protect the projects, acting in accordance with trademark agreements)

Sharing plans, activities and results publicly with the community (different standards depending on the group)

Relevant legal requirements that apply to the group and the group's jurisdiction

Foundation, Chapters, local groups. editing communities. (Project leads, individuals involved in the above?)

Principles for enabling internal accountability to the movement:

proactive management of accountability: Group has responsibility to self-report and regulate on its own accountability requirements
self-regulation: Group sets own standards for accountability subject to broader "to be considered" standards (that are group appropriate)
public action and reporting as default: Groups should act and report in public as a default, private should be an exception with justification
reasonable review of a group's status within the movement (where and when required - frequently, never, active, passive) :
<keep in mind> Minimizing bureaucracy

Principles for enabling external accountability to the movement:

public action and reporting as default: Groups should act and report in public as a default, private should be an exception with justification
clear description of the group's purpose, activities and contact information

Process for review

This can be tricky, but is important. How are the different movement roles reviewed, measured, summarized?