Meta talk:Administrators/Removal (inactivity)/April 2009

I think Majorlys proposal here looks fine, I think "other admins with fewer than 10 logged actions" should be given more than a week to sign after being notified at their talk page though. Finn Rindahl 20:23, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

I think a week is perfectly reasonable. They would be notified of course. Majorly ^talk 22:14, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Damn - meant to post here.

My only thought was that stewards should be sysops here but I guess with global adminship that ceases to be an issue. As such - fine with me. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:04, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

I can't really see why stewards should be default sysop'ed at Meta if they don't use the rights here. Finn Rindahl 12:25, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Agree, if they want permanent rights, all they should do is ask. Well, I'm a bit wary of saying there's "consensus" here, so I'll leave it up to someone else to say so, then we can remove the rights of the first few, then message the other admins. Majorly ^talk 13:54, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Have the admins listed on "List of other admins with fewer than 10 logged actions" already been notified of this? —Dferg (talk) 17:20, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

No. I agree with Majorly that we need more users to add their support here before we really can call it a consensus and start implementing it. Finn Rindahl 17:32, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Obviously, I'll support this. Keeping in mind my comments in the original discussion, I prefer admin actions to edits (and likewise for any other rights), and I prefer a higher bar than most, generally :)  — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 01:55, 4 April 2009 (UTC)