Meta:Requests for adminship/lustiger seth

The following discussion is closed: Promoted, by Alexanderps. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 12:10, 9 October 2008 (UTC)\ [reply]

user:lustiger_seth

RfA scheduled to end at 9:21, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello!
I'm an administrator on the german wikipedia. Most notably I take care of the spamblacklist there. The reason for this request is related to that: the global blacklist. :-)
I've been temp. admin here for two months now (see Meta:Requests for adminship/wiki_seth) and want to go on with that; see user_talk:Mike.lifeguard#temp.->permanent_adminship? for details.
So I'm requesting a temporary adminship till end of march 2009. -- seth 09:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I support renewed temp. adminship. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 09:58, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support! (I would not mind if the adminship becomes a 'permanent' one, all help with the blacklist is welcome, and I am sure you will use it responsibly; we all make mistakes anyway and they can be repaired as well). --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} (en: U, T) 10:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, thanks for helping, --birdy geimfyglið _(:> )=| 11:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Seth has done good work and continuing it is welcome. Please do feel free to read my comments for more of my thinking on this. — Mike.lifeguard | ^talk 11:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - fine with me & thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:59, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Majorly ^talk 12:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, for temp admin. Alex Pereira ^falaê 12:12, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, extend it. →Christian .И 12:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hasn't broken anything yet. MBisanz ^talk 20:11, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabexplosive The archive man 09:31, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Huji 19:05, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
support _~Innv^s: 02:43, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ferrer 11:45, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Vandalismterminator 15:26, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, absolutely. Thunderhead 20:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - if this guy is trusted enough on his home wiki, surely he can be here? Spam blacklisting - always need more spaxperts here! (In case you're wondering what a spaxpert is, it's a neologism I coined - "spamming expert!) --Kelsington 20:55, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
support Why not permanent? --Thogo (talk) 21:32, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support for indefinite temporary adminship scoped for spam blacklist issues. Daniel (talk) 00:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I would also support a request for regular adminship. WJBscribe (talk) 00:29, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support looks fine, thanks for helping. --Kanonkas 17:27, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for helping out. --Erwin(85) 18:01, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why not request permanent? Seems needful, seems you have wide support, seems you're doing good work. I suggest withdrawing and rerequesting permanent. But if not, no biggie, and you have my support for temp. ++Lar: t/c 21:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawing, and re-requesting you mean? I don't see how beneficial that would be. Majorly ^talk 22:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Majorly. A restart would cost the same as a prospective request for a perm. adminship for example in march 2009. So it's probably better to leave it now as it is and wait just a few remaining hours. -- seth 00:54, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]