Meta:Requests for adminship/Laleena

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

I want temporary admin status to do some blocks & revert vandalism. Laleena 00:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I'm not in favour of generic temporary requests, since meta sysops have access to a set of protected pages that can interfere with all Wikimedia projects. Furthermore, #Temporary_adminship is strictly limited in time and depth and is usually granted upon a specific reason. --M/ 00:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This user does not have a clear need for adminship on meta, not even temporary, and is, in my view, not experienced enough yet in any case with less than 500 edits on en:wp and less than 5 on commons, the two places I spot checked (user lists en:wp as their favourite) Perhaps after some significant experience elsewhere and a clear need is established. ++Lar: t/c 01:17, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, unneeded. --.anaconda 17:05, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No; Slade ♠ 19:47, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
oppose unneeded --User:Dario vet/Sign 19:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Oppose --Marbot 19:40, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, no need for admin tools. --Coredesat (en.wp) 00:54, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose All of the above. Sorry, nothing personal.--Sir James Paul 01:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]