- Contacts to GLAMs (?)
- Developer Time – T (?)
- Curators, Archivists, Librarians, Historians – T (?)
- Volunteers from Wikimedia – T (?)
- GLAM Coordinator – maybe (?)
- GLAM volunteers (?)
- Uploader tool (?)
- Legal advice – pro-bono or board (?)
- Needs assessment (?)
- Servers/Computers – Scanner – M (?)
- Venues for hackathon, conference, etc. (?)
- Space at GLAM for events (?)
- Social Media accounts and blogs (?)
- Software (?)
- Lessons learned/best practices from former/other projects – T (?)
|
- Wikimedia Commons Volunteers (?)
- Wikipedia Users (?)
- People working for the GLAM (?)
- Wikisourcers (?)
- Chapter Staff (?)
- Wikimedia colleagues (?)
- GLAM volunteers (?)
- Like-minded organizations (OXFN, CC) (?)
- Hackers and developer staff (?)
- Journalists (?)
- Policy-makers (?)
- Government agency in charge of managing/monetizing GLAM content(?)
- Artists and estates (?)
|
- Inviting GLAMs to GLAM-Wiki Con (?)
- Have meetings with the GLAM (?)
- Presentations and info talks for community (?)
- Researching GLAMs – who, what, where (?)
- Write/draft/review contract/agreement (?)
- Workshops on free license, WikiCommons etc (?)
- Build tools to help with curation (?)
- Helping to build the environment (legal) where GLAMs CAN donate content (?)
- Help/have GLAMs figure out licensing (?)
- Map metadata to commons templates (?)
- Convert audio/video (?)
- Create partnership page and the partnership templates (?)
- Gather metrics (?)
- Promotion of content – blogs, social media, press release (?)
- Do the categorization (?)
- Case Study (?)
|
- Uploaded content to commons (?)
- GLAM contests – competing against each other (?)
- Edit-a-thons about media subject (?)
- Hack-a-thon (?)
- Contests – Wikipedia content with images (?)
- Picking up GLAMs – networking etc. (?)
|
- Shared goals/Mutual Understanding (2)
- Built trust (3)
- Learning about free licenses (2.5)
- GLAM sees other GLAM blog about licenses and decides to proceed on open license (3)
- Volunteers at GLAM grow confident in using upload wizard (2)
- Director decides open licensing is the future and likes the idea (1)
- Wikimedia volunteers are willing to work on GLAM collections (1)
|
- Upload happens (1)
- GLAM standardizes metadata (2)
- Volunteers give feedback on quality, usefulness, etc. (2)
- GLAM uses feedback for their internal processes (2)
- Wikimedians build templates (1)
- GLAM staff chooses content (?)
- Scan images (1)
- Release content under a free license (2)
- Provide metadata (1)
- Signing agreement/contract (1)
- GLAM volunteers commit on long-term cooperation (3)
- Some illustrated Wikipedia articles (1)
- Contributors curate the new content donated (1)
- GLAM blogs and tweets (1.5)
- Wikimedians blog and tweet about the donation (1)
- Multiple images become featured/quality in Commons (1.5)
- Increased coverage of subjects (1.5)
- GLAM presents at conferences about donation (2)
|
- GLAM Institution enabled to carry out self-sustaining projects (2)
- Wikimedia is considered a reliable and trustworthy partner for GLAM (3)
- GLAM financially, or with staff time, supports better upload infrastructure (?)
- Cultural change within GLAM Institutions = pro open content (3)
- Law is passed so that GLAM content is freely licensed by definition (2.5)
- GLAM performance is also measured on their openness (3)
- Broader use of free licenses (2)
- Free licenses become “standard” for GLAM digitization projects (2.5)
- General public expect GLAMs to freely license/open donate their content (3)
- Other GLAMs are doing similar projects (2)
- Permanent page on GLAM website about partnership/licensing (1)
|
