Interwiki synchronization/Apple vs. Malus domesticus
The interwiki links in hsb:Jabłuko and hsb:Zahrodna jabłučina were mixed, although the first one has the topic apple (like a fruit, not a species) and the second one has the topic Malus domestica (a species). Yesterday I manually repaired this in the upper Sorbian articles only.
I found three groups.
Group 1
editThey are in hsb:Jabłuko (the fruit of trees in Malus genus).
- cs:Jablko
- da:Æble
- el:Μήλο
- es:Manzana
- et:Õun
- eu:Sagar
- fr:Pomme
- gd:Ubhal (I am not sure, if this is correct here. --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC))
- hak:Phìn-kó (I am not sure, if this is correct here. --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC))
- ia:Pomo
- ksh:Appel (för ze esse)
- la:Malum
- lb:Apel
- lt:Obuolys (maistas)
- lv:Ābols
- mg:Paoma
- oc:Poma
- ru:Яблоко
- sco:Aiple
- sk:Jablko
- sl:Jabolko
- sw:Tofaa
- uk:Яблуко
- wa:Pemî
I removed all interwiki links, which now are in the second group and have to be in third group and not had to be corrected in the second group.
Subgroup 1.1
editA wider botanical concept of a type of fruit (i.e. the fruit of Apple tree, pear, etc.)
Group 2
editThey are in hsb:Zahrodna jabłučina (the species Malus domestica)
- ar:تفاح (I can not read the letters, and that's why don't know its topic. The article don't have a taxobox. --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC) The article is about en:Apple. --Meno25 19:06, 28 March 2009 (UTC))
- as:আপেল (I can not read the letters, and that's why don't know its topic. The article don't have a taxobox. --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC))
- ast:Malus domestica
- az:Alma
- bat-smg:Vuobelis
- bg:Ябълка
- bn:আপেল
- bs:Jabuka
- ca:Pomera
- cv:Панулми
- cy:Afal
- da:Almindelig Æble
- de:Kulturapfel
- en:Apple
- eo:Pomo
- es:Malus domestica
- et:Õunapuu
- eu:Sagarrondo
- fa:سیب
- fi:Tarhaomenapuu
- fr:Pommier domestique
- fur:Miluçâr (I am not sure, if this is correct here. --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC))
- gl:Maceira
- hak:Phìn-kó (I am not sure, if this is correct here. --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC))
- hi:सेब (I can not read the letters, and that's why don't know its topic. The article don't have a taxobox. --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC))
- hr:Jabuka
- ht:Pòm
- hu:Alma
- id:Apel
- is:Epli
- it:Malus domestica
- ja:リンゴ (I am not sure, if this is correct here. I found in the article the science name Malus pumila. Thus, it could be a fourth group. --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC))
- jv:Apel
- kk:Алма
- ko:사과
- ku:Sêv
- ml:ആപ്പിള്
- ms:Epal
- nn:Eple
- pt:Maçã
- ru:Яблоня домашняя
- qu:Mansana
- simple:Apple
- sk:Jabloň domáca
- sl:Jablana
- sr:Домаћа јабука
- sv:Äpple
- ta:ஆப்பிள்
- th:แอปเปิล
- tr:Elma
- uk:Яблуня домашня
- vec:Malus domestica
- vi:Táo tây
- yi:עפל
- zh:苹果
- zh-min-nan:Phōng-kó
- zh-yue:蘋果 (I am not sure, if this is correct here, because the article has not an taxobox. --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC))
I removed some interwiki links, which was in it and has to be in the first group:
- cs, el, ksh, la, lb, lv, lt, mg, oc, ru, sco
I corrected some interwiki links, whose old ones are now in the first group:
- da da:Æble (frugt) into da:Almindelig Æble
- es es:Manzana into es:Malus domestica
- et et:Õun into et:Õunapuu
- eu eu:Sagar into eu:Sagarrondo
- fr fr:Pomme into fr:Pommier domestique
- sk sk:Jablko into sk:Jabloň domáca
- sl sl:Jabolko into sl:Jablana
And I removed some interwiki links, which has to be in the third group. I corrected one link only.
- sr sr:Јабука into sr:Домаћа јабука
Group 3
editSome interwiki links where in both pages, but they have to be in the page hsb:Jabłučina, because its topic is the genus Maluṡ. But I am not added them there yet.
- he he:תפוח
- nah nah:Mazatexocotl
- nds-nl nds-nl:Appel (vruch)
- nl nl:Appel (vrucht)
- no no:Epler
- sr sr:Јабука
- uk uk:Яблуня
- ru ru:Яблоня
- en en:Malus
Discussion
editI only corrected the articles hsb:Jabłuko and hsb:Zahrodna jabłučina in the upper Sorbian wikipedia and the Uppersorbian interwiki in de:Kulturapfel (an article about the fruit is not there). I hope, that anybody can help to correct this muddle. Greetings --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Conclusion
edit<rishabh>