Have the patents for VP9 expired yet?

NO! ☹️ (however, these patents may not be needed for VP9, they may just be a speculation) 🙂

The VP9 codec was created by the AOM (Alliance for Open Media), they stated that the codec violates no patents when it was ratified.

Since then however Sisvel has created a patent pool of companies that claim that VP9 violates their patents. This Wiki article lists these patents, derived from: https://www.sisvel.com/licensing-programmes/audio-and-video-coding-decoding/video-coding-platform/#tab-patents. There could be patents registered elsewhere which are not listed here. Their dates will be added later.

It is not clear if these patents are legit or not, since many were (or are being) invalidated. Also note that the Sisvel patent pool includes expired patents (omitted in this article).

Note that AOMedia released a statement about Sisvel patent list (https://aomedia.org/press%20releases/the-alliance-for-open-media-statement/).

This is not legal advice. Here's my legal advice: call your lawyer.

European patents

edit

US patents

edit

US patents only, look them up on https://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair. https://www.uspto.gov/patent/laws-and-regulations/patent-term-calculator contains instructions for calculating when patents expire.

Patent no. Filing or 371 ©Date Earliest Publication Date Issue Date of Patent Expires Patent holder Title of Invention Note
US10297008 2025-11-07
US10499058 2025-05-11
US9294771 2025-12-11
US10362311 2032-06-20 lawsuit
US9319694 2032-06-20 lawsuit
US9661335 2032-06-20 lawsuit
US9654783 2032-06-20 lawsuit
US7319415 2025-05-04
US10178393 2030-01-18 same family as of US8867854
US10321137 2029-11-21 same family as of US8867854
US8867854 2031-05-16 invalid, see https://www.unifiedpatents.com/insights/2021/10/8/another-etri-chinese-patent-held-invalid and https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/ptab/case/IPR2020-01048
US9369737 2029-10-01 same family as of US8867854
US9407937 2029-10-01 same family as of US8867854
US9942554 2029-10-01 same family as of US8867854
US10129549 2031-04-11 lawsuit
US10123025 2031-04-11 lawsuit
US10148968 2031-04-11 lawsuit
US7515635 2026-02-13 confirmed invalid in March 2023: https://www.unifiedpatents.com/insights/2023/4/17/ip-bridge-patent-confirmed-invalid
US8009733 2026-09-03 same family as of US7515635
US8184697 2026-09-10 same family as of US7515635
US8204112 2026-10-08 same family as of US7515635
US8223841 2026-11-05 same family as of US7515635
US9402087 2030-11-05
US10051283 2031-11-27
US10298954 2029-11-04
US9654798 2029-11-10
US9674551 2029-09-01
US9838696 2029-09-01
US9854250 2029-09-01
US8818114 2031-03-18
US9148660 2029-09-24
US9491467 2029-09-24
US9369714 2030-05-13
US9992510 2030-01-07
US9070179 2030-01-15
US9363531 2030-01-15
US9420304 2030-01-15
US9445118 2030-01-15
US8976863 2032-02-24
US9392300 2029-10-23
US9781445 2030-06-27
US9794590 2030-06-27
US9955182 2030-06-13
US9137546 2031-01-19
US9628815 2029-10-07
US9565444 2030-10-01
US9549190 2032-12-30
US9609334 2030-10-01
US9609335 2030-10-01
US9479791 2031-05-25 lawsuit
US9532065 2031-05-12 lawsuit
US9787988 2031-05-12 lawsuit
US9113138 2032-06-14
US9113139 2031-11-12
US9143777 2030-09-24
US9154779 2030-09-24
US9294768 2030-09-24
US9392282 2030-09-24
US9148659 2030-09-24
US9973753 2031-03-31
US10390011 2031-03-31
US10412385 2031-03-31