Grants talk:IdeaLab/College Campaign to Promote Wikipedia as a Digital Literacy Skill
@Leahmacvie:I have a bit of a question: what would you say qualifies as "top contributor". I'm a little leery about offering cash prizes for editing Wikipedia, especially if part of the initiative is to get new users to edit Wikipedia. What concerns me is that we'll have a lot of people, most to all of whom will have little to no editing experience, coming on to Wikipedia and making a ton of pages in order to win a cash prize. Since they don't have any true experience with editing, there will be an extremely high likelihood that the pages will have a lot of issues with them. This is a pretty common issue with university classes that create pages as part of the curriculum, so I am extremely concerned that this problem will only be exacerbated when you have a large group of people that will not have the close supervision that a student in a specific classroom situation would have. The number of people entering could be quite large, so it'd be a huge undertaking to keep track of everyone even if they did register with the project manager as a participant.
I think that this could be somewhat helped by being a little less vague in the wording and emphasizing that it's not the number of edits or pages created that will mark one as a top contributor, but the quality of the contributions that fall within Wikipedia guidelines. It'd also be a good idea to make sure that the supervisory staff (including project managers, student work study, etc) have an extremely good working knowledge of Wikipedia's guidelines, as you guys will be the first people that they ask for help or further explanation on a policy or guideline. You can get some experienced admins and non-college editors to help, but the "IRL" people will be the ones that they will want to turn to for help. Also, limiting the number of participants could be beneficial as well since it'd make it easier for the project manager to keep up with, since this would have the potential to turn into a full time job since they (and their helpers) would potentially have to monitor hundreds of accounts and edits. I do think that the scholarship should be open to both male and female editors, though. It just seems a little bit unfair that the project as a whole is open to everyone, but the scholarship is only available for female editors. I know that you're trying to get more female editors on the site, but that just seems a little uneven.
ties to existing Wikimedia/Wikipedia programsEdit
@Leahmacvie: Hi there,
thanks for your idea. I wonder if you can expand on how your approach differs from existing programs that encourage use of Wikipedia in schools? I'm thinking specifically of the Wikipedia Education Program Wikipedia Education Program (WEP), which offers a lot of resources and provides necessary infrastructure for engaging university and college students in Wikipedia editing. (Perhaps of interest - there are also courses currently being through the program that focus on women and gender issues - see the course list for examples.)
Similar to the comment from above, I also wonder if you can provide more info regarding the competition idea that would specifically address female Wikipedia contribution. What might this look like? How might the competition be designed to achieve this aim? And do you think the series of workshops you propose could also include content specifically looking at the gender gap and how to address it?
Just do this idea. If you want a cash reward, raise the money yourself. But it's hardly fair to ask the organization to benefit your campus and you. 18.104.22.168 21:49, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Interest in CollaborationEdit
@Leahmacvie: Hi, I'm interested in working on a similar project on my campus (probably rather smaller scale, maybe with different funding). I'd like to get in touch with you if possible. Daclausen (talk) 21:15, 25 March 2015 (UTC) U Nebraska Women & Wikipedia Campaign
Eligibility confirmed, Inspire CampaignEdit
This Inspire Grant proposal is under review!
We've confirmed your proposal is eligible for the Inspire Campaign review. Please feel free to ask questions and make changes to this proposal as discussions continue during this community comments period.
The committee's formal review begins on 6 April 2015, and grants will be announced at the end of April. See the schedule for more details.
Questions? Contact us at grants(at)wikimedia.org.
Aggregated feedback from the committee for College Campaign to Promote Wikipedia as a Digital Literacy SkillEdit
|(A) Impact potential
|(B) Community engagement
|(C) Ability to execute
|(D) Measures of success
|Additional comments from the Committee:
Inspire funding decisionEdit
This project has not been selected for an Inspire Grant at this time.
We love that you took the chance to creatively improve the Wikimedia movement. The committee has reviewed this proposal and not recommended it for funding, but we hope you'll continue to engage in the program. Please drop by the IdeaLab to share and refine future ideas!
- Review the feedback provided on your proposal and to ask for any clarifications you need using this talk page.
- Visit the IdeaLab to continue developing this idea and share any new ideas you may have.
- To reapply with this project in the future, please make updates based on the feedback provided in this round before resubmitting it for review in a new round.
- Check the Individual Engagement Grant schedule for the next open call to submit proposals or the Project and Event Grant pages if your idea is to support expenses for offline events - we look forward to helping you apply for a grant in the future.
Questions? Contact us at grants wikimedia.org