Grants talk:APG/Proposals/2014-2015 round1/Wikimedia Österreich/Staff proposal assessment

Clarification on content generated in context of our activities

Please note that the 2013/2014 comparison of the numbers concerning articles in the assessment is not accurate: In our quarterly reports we only report on our smart goals, hence the number of articles only relates to editing events and book grants. The number from last year is taken from our impact report and includes writing contests. Of course the number of articles is way bigger with them, but as we did not include them in our 2014 goals we don't report on them in the quarterlies, hence the smaller number.

Some context regarding funding diversification

It is true that we're behind of what we wanted to raise in external funds, but now that we agreed upon paying more attention to in-kind donations, the overall picture becomes a bit different: Due to our good partnerships we could raise more than 10.000 EUR in-kind donations in Q3 for example.

--CDG (WMAT staff) (talk) 19:54, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Response from FDC staff

Thank you, Claudia, and colleagues at WMAT. We are truly grateful for your additional comments and data. We'll make sure the FDC is aware of these perspectives as a part of their deliberations. Again, many thanks for responding with this information. Warmly, KLove (WMF) (talk) 03:48, 15 November 2014 (UTC)