Grants:Programs/Wikimedia Community Fund/Rapid Fund/LUCG Final-Half Schedule (ID: 22141346)/Final Report
Report Status: Accepted
Due date: 2024-01-30T00:00:00Z
Funding program: Rapid Fund
Report type: Final
This is an automatically generated Meta-Wiki page. The page was copied from Fluxx, the grantmaking web service of Wikimedia Foundation where the user has submitted their midpoint report. Please do not make any changes to this page because all changes will be removed after the next update. Use the discussion page for your feedback. The page was created by CR-FluxxBot.General information edit
- Title of Proposal: LUCG Final-Half Schedule
- Username of Applicant: Sunkanmi12
- Name of Organization: N/A
- Amount awarded: 5222.82
- Amount spent: 4944.17 USD, 59330 GHS
Part 1 Understanding your work edit
1. Briefly describe how your proposed activities and strategies were implemented
Throughout the project's duration, we conducted eight (8) successful editathons, each dedicated to specific themes aimed at increasing the visibility of underrepresented genders. This strategic approach sought to correct biases and stimulate active volunteer participation. Regular meetups with community members and editors played a crucial role in sustaining enthusiasm, facilitating open discussions for valuable feedback.
Building on the initial success, ongoing efforts involved welcoming new participants while maintaining a focus on women's content. The curation team persisted in researching and sourcing references for comprehensive and credible information.
Simultaneously, periodic meetups remained integral, playing a crucial role in sustaining enthusiasm and commitment. Face-to-face interactions provided a lasting platform for open discussions, empowering the team to promptly address concerns and implement enhancements based on continuous insights from the community. Our activities were executed with a steadfast commitment to inclusivity and ongoing collaboration, ensuring a sustained impact on addressing the Content Gender Gap and fostering Community Engagement.
2. Were there any strategies or approaches that you felt were effective in achieving your goals? Please describe these strategies and approaches.
A pivotal aspect of success was the establishment of a diligent curation team consisting of five members. This team played a crucial role in researching and sourcing relevant references during editathons, ensuring the availability of comprehensive and credible information. Their dedication significantly contributed to project success by supporting volunteers and elevating the overall quality of the created content.
Periodic meetups with community members and editors played a vital role in sustaining enthusiasm and commitment. These face-to-face interactions facilitated open and constructive discussions, enabling participants to express thoughts and provide valuable feedback. This ongoing engagement maintained a dynamic and responsive project environment, where concerns were promptly addressed, and necessary enhancements were implemented based on continual insights from the community.
3. Please use this space to upload media and other files that help tell your story and impact.
Field to type in URLs.
N/A
4. To what extent do you agree with the following statements regarding the work carried out with the support of this Fund? You can choose “not applicable” if your work does not relate to these goals.
| A. Bring in participants from underrepresented groups | Strongly agree |
| B. Create a more inclusive and connected culture in our community | Strongly agree |
| C. Develop content about underrepresented topics/groups | Strongly agree |
| D. Develop content from underrepresented perspectives | Neither agree nor disagree |
| E. Encourage the retention of editors | Strongly agree |
| F. Encourage the retention of organizers | Strongly agree |
5. Is there anything else you would like to share about how your efforts helped to bring in participants and/or build out content, particularly for underrepresented groups?
No
Part 2: Your main learning edit
6. In your application, you outlined your learning priorities. What did you learn about these areas during this period?
The successful communication strategy for reaching new editors or volunteers involved personal engagement, where we explained the movement's essence and utilized the "tell a friend to tell a friend" method. We aimed to maintain this approach for upcoming initiatives, fostering community and enthusiasm. Recognizing the influence of educational institutions, we planned to use school structures to promote the movement within Pentecost University, enhancing outreach.
The experience suggested that a hands-on and thematic approach was highly effective in training participants to become active Wikidata and Wikipedia editors. Editathons with specific themes introduced participants to the editing process and guided content creation in areas aligned with their interests, ensuring practical engagement. The establishment of a diligent curation team provided valuable support during training, enhancing participants' ability to contribute meaningfully to Wikidata and Wikipedia.
7. Did anything unexpected or surprising happen when implementing your activities?This can include both positive and negative situations. What did you learn from those experiences?
No
8. How do you hope to use this learning? For instance, do you have any new priorities, ideas for activities, or goals for the future?
9. Documentation of resources: Use this space to upload any documents that would be useful to share with others (e.g. communications material, training material, presentations).
Here is an additional field to type in URLs.
N/A
Part 3: Metrics edit
10a. Open Metrics reporting
In your application, you defined some open metrics and targets (goals). You will see a table like the one below with your metric in the title and the target you set in your proposal automatically filled in. Use the tables to report the result. Use the comments column to describe any aspects of this result that you find relevant. If the results were different from the initial target (goals) then you can explain why and what you learned from this. You can also provide any qualitative analysis regarding these results. In the last column please describe the tools and methodology used to collect this data and any difficulties you might have had.
| Open Metrics | Description | Target | Results | Comments | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
10b. Core Metrics reporting
In your application, you defined targets for some core metrics and targets (goals). You will see a table like the one below with each core metric in the title and the target you set in your proposal automatically filled in. Use the tables to report the result. Use the comments column to describe any aspects of this result that you find relevant. If the results were different from the initial target (goals) then you can explain why and what you learned from this. You can also provide any qualitative analysis regarding these results. In the last column please describe the tools and methodology used to collect this data and any difficulties you might have had. Note: a table will appear for each Wikimedia project content contribution you defined in your proposal.
| Core metrics | Description | Target | Results | Comments | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of participants | 200 | 200 | |||
| Number of editors | 200 | 200 | |||
| Number of organizers | 6 | 6 |
| Wikimedia Project | Description | Target | Results | Comments | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wikipedia | N/A | 500 | 500 | N/A | N/A |
| Wikidata | N/A | 500 | 500 | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
12. Did you have any difficulties collecting data to measure your results? This could include things like a lack of time or resources, or the expertise in your team to collect this data. It could also include difficulties with particular data collection tools.
No
12a. State what difficulties you had.
N/A
12b. How do you hope to overcome these challenges in the future? Do you have any recommendations for the Foundation to support you in addressing these challenges?
N/A
13. Use this space to upload any documents and provide links to any tools you have used that would be useful to understand your data collection (e.g., surveys you have carried out, communications material, training material, program and event dashboard link, project page on Meta).
Here is an additional field to type in URLs.
14. Have you shared these results with other Wikimedian communities (either affiliates, user groups, volunteers, etc., different to yours)? This can include things such as data and direct outcomes, lessons you have learned, or information on how to run or recreate your programs.
Yes
14a. If yes or partially, please describe how you have already shared them and if you would like to do more sharing, and if so how.
Part 4: Financial reporting and compliance edit
15. & 14a. Please state the total amount spent in your local currency.
59330 GHS
16. Please state the total amount spent in USD.
4944.17 USD
17. Please report the funds received and spending in the currency of your fund.
17a. Upload a financial report file.
17b. Please provide a link to your financial reporting document.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gytaOZJBrG9fMwBVBGcNolkPeQ8DTrkoFyTPyZGRVq0/edit?usp=sharing
As required in the fund agreement, please report any deviations from your fund proposal here. Note that, among other things, any changes must be consistent with our WMF mission, must be for charitable purposes as defined in the grant agreement, and must otherwise comply with the grant agreement.
17c. If you have not already done so in your budget report, please provide information on changes in the budget in relation to your original proposal.
N/A
18. Do you have any unspent funds from the Fund?
No
18a. Please list the amount and currency you did not use and explain why.
N/A
18b. What are you planning to do with the underspent funds?
N/A
18c. Please provide details of hope to spend these funds.
N/A
19. Are you in compliance with the terms outlined in the fund agreement?
Yes
20. Are you in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations as outlined in the grant agreement?
Yes
21. Are you in compliance with provisions of the United States Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), and with relevant tax laws and regulations restricting the use of the Funds as outlined in the grant agreement? In summary, this is to confirm that the funds were used in alignment with the WMF mission and for charitable/nonprofit/educational purposes.
Yes
22. If you have additional recommendations or reflections that don’t fit into the above sections, please write them here.
Other documents