Grants:IdeaLab/Quality VS References

IdeaLab beaker and flask.svg
Quality VS References
La "qualité" exige des références; le nombre de references, en chiffre absolu et par X bytes" pourrait servir à promouvoir de manière instantanée, sans intervention des évaluateurs, les "articles les mieux documentés". (Number of references, total and per X bytes, to promote automatically the best documented articles)AndWater (talk) 22:22, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Hex icon with lightning white.svg
idea creator
AndWater
this project needs...
Hex icon with hand black.svg
volunteer
join
endorse
created on22:22, 22 March 2016 (UTC)


Project ideaEdit

What is the problem you're trying to solve?Edit

What is quality ? How to assess it ? And how to combine the search for visibility with qualiry ? (In French: Comment combiner la recherche de visibilité avec la qualité ?)

What is your solution?Edit

The principle I propose is the foillowing: Put quality first, and show it is important; Visibility will come by itself. Accept lower visibility if lower quality, and reputation will gain; time acting on a good reputation. inclufing growing quality, will endlessly increase visibility.

Imagine a new and objective criteria to globally and automatically assess (that aspect of) quality...

1) To calculate and indicate number of byte per reference, - as a clue... (an approach to "quality management")

2) Evaluate if this newly defined criteria statistically correspond to the stage actually defined for the "advancement" of articles;

3 identify articles apparently deficient, as well as groups of related articles within projects.

4) Use this (eventually validated) and automatic approach to promote "best documented articles",

GoalsEdit

Get InvolvedEdit

About the idea creatorEdit

ParticipantsEdit

EndorsementsEdit

Expand your ideaEdit

Would a grant from the Wikimedia Foundation help make your idea happen? You can expand this idea into a grant proposal.

Expand into an Individual Engagement Grant
Expand into a Project and Event Grant