GLAM/Conferences/Survey

The survey is closed. Thank you for your input!


Welcome! The Wikimedia Foundation's Culture and Heritage team is launching a survey to gather input and data to help create a decision-making framework for future GLAM-Wiki conferences.

The goal of this process is to decentralize decision-making away from the Wikimedia Foundation and enable the GLAM-Wiki community to take collective ownership of the conference. This may include forming a steering committee and making key decisions, such as determining the location of future conferences, their frequency, and other related matters.

Your input is very important and will help to improve the next GLAM-Wiki conferences!

Survey questions

edit
Privacy notice
You can choose to share your contact information if you would like to be informed of the results. The data is maintained solely to create a decision-making framework for GLAM-Wiki conferences.

Check the privacy statement for this survey here.

Question, description, options Type Mandatory
Identification
What is your name? Short free text No
In which country are you based?

You can also choose "I prefer not to say", "A country not listed here", or leave the question unanswered.

List (dropdown) No
What is your preferred email address? Short free text No
What is your Wikimedia username? Short free text No
What is your affiliation, if any?
  • No affiliation
  • I prefer not to say
  • Add your affiliation: [Short free text]
Multiple choice Yes
GLAM-Wiki experience
Have you attended a GLAM-Wiki conference before? If yes, please add which ones. Find all GLAM-related events here.
  • GLAM Wiki 2023 (Montevideo, Uruguay)
  • GLAM Wiki 2018 (Tel Aviv, Israel)
  • GLAM-WIKI 2015 (The Hague, Netherlands)
  • GLAM-WIKI 2013 (London, United Kingdom)
  • Other: [Short free text]
  • I have never attended a GLAM-Wiki conference before
Multiple choice Yes
Do you plan to attend the next GLAM-Wiki conference, scheduled for 2025 in Lisbon, Portugal? This is the official conference page.
  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure yet
Multiple choice Yes
Have you participated in organizing a previous GLAM-Wiki conference?
  • Yes
  • No
Multiple choice Yes
If you answered "yes" to the last question, please describe your participation, including your role and whether you participated as part of an affiliate. Long free text No
Do you work with GLAM-Wiki currently? Please, answer this question considering your professional activities.
  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure: [Short free text]
Multiple choice Yes
If you answered "yes" to the last question, do you work with GLAM-Wiki as...
  • Staff from a Wikimedia affiliate
  • Staff from a Culture and Heritage institution
  • An individual contributor
  • Wikimedian in Residence
  • As a staff member / member of another organization (i.e., Creative Commons, OpenRefine)
  • Other: [Short free text]
Multiple choice No
Have you presented or participated in a session during a previous GLAM-Wiki conference?
  • Yes
  • No
Multiple choice Yes
GLAM-Wiki conference details
What do you think could be the unique strength or specialty of the GLAM-Wiki conference compared to other Wikimedia events?

For example, if you're a librarian and attended WikiLibCon (2022 or 2025 editions), or if you attended a GLAM Meetup during Wikimania. Other GLAM events are available here.

Long free text No
At what cadence should a global GLAM-Wiki conference happen?
  • Every 2 years
  • Every 3 years
  • Every 4 years
  • Every 5 years
Raking Yes
Should the GLAM-Wiki conference alternate years with the WikiLibCon, the Wikimedia and Libraries conference?
  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
  • Other: [Short free text]
Multiple choice Yes
Should the location of the GLAM-Wiki conference alternate regions? In this question, we are considering the Wikimedia regions.
  • Yes, it should be in a new region every time.
  • No, it is not necessary to alternate.
  • Not sure
Multiple choice Yes
If the GLAM-Wiki conference alternates regions, should it alternate through every region before repeating the first region?

For example, since the next GLAM-Wiki conference is in Europe, should it be held in Europe again only after seven editions? In this question, we are considering the eight Wikimedia regions.

  • Yes, it should alternate through every region before it repeats.
  • No, it should not have to alternate through every region before it repeats a region.
  • Other: [Short free text]
Multiple choice Yes
Consider the last GLAM-Wiki Conference locations: Portugal (Europe), Uruguay (Latin America), Israel (Middle East), the Netherlands (Europe), and the United Kingdom (Europe). In which region should the next conference take place?

In this question, we are considering the Wikimedia regions.

  • Middle East & North Africa
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • South Asia
  • East, Southeast Asia, & Pacific
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • North America
  • Northern & Western Europe
  • Central & Eastern Europe & Central Asia
Ranking Yes
Which criteria should be considered when choosing the location for the GLAM-Wiki conference?
  • Solid GLAM-Wiki activities
  • Alignment with relevant GLAM conferences (or other professional development opportunities)
  • Availability of cultural heritage organizations
  • Community alignment
  • Experience of the organizing team
  • Experience of the local Wikimedia community
  • Diversity and inclusion
  • Safety of the location
  • Visa requirements
  • Ease of access
  • Possibility of the local Wikimedia community growing (community development)
  • Venue availability
  • Accommodation availability
  • Date availability
  • Eligibility of the Wikimedia affiliate
Ranking Yes
Would you like to suggest additional criteria for consideration when selecting the location for the GLAM-Wiki conference, beyond those listed in the previous question? Long free text No
How long before the conference should the host be appointed?
  • 3 years
  • 2 and a half years
  • 2 years
  • 1 and a half year
  • 1 year
Ranking Yes
To choose among affiliates that want to host a GLAM-Wiki conference, should the local affiliate that is applying already perform GLAM-Wiki-related activities? If that is not necessary, what else should be considered in the bidding score?

For "bidding score", please refer to Wikimedia CEE Meeting's Bidding process as a reference.

  • Yes
  • No
  • No, and here are my suggestions of what should be considered: [Short free text]
Multiple choice Yes
If you answered "yes" to the last question, for how long should the affiliate be involved in GLAM-Wiki activities?
  • At least 1 year of experience
  • Between 2 and 5 years of experience
  • Between 5 and 10 years of experience
  • 10+ years of experience
Ranking No
Who should decide the location of the GLAM-Wiki conferences?
  • A potential dedicated GLAM-Wiki conference committee
  • A potential GLAM-Wiki affiliate
  • A potential hub-like structure (more about hubs)
  • A potential GLAM-Wiki conference user group (e.g., WikiConference North America User Group)
  • The Wikimedia Foundation
  • Other: [Short free text]
Multiple choice Yes
Should a dedicated GLAM-Wiki conference committee be formed? If you answer "no", could you suggest alternatives? For example, a village pump discussion, a dedicated voting process on the wiki, a grant officer's decision, a regional committee's decision, and so on.

For "conference committee", please refer to Wiki Indaba's Steering Committee as a reference.

  • Yes
  • Not sure
  • No, and here is my suggested alternative: [Short free text]
Multiple choice Yes
Thank you message
Thank you for participating in this survey and helping to improve the process of GLAM-Wiki conferences. If you have any comments or concerns, refer to this discussion page.