File talk:WikiFlatBook344.png

Learn more about this page

The 'internationally lookalike' type is specially designed for Wikipedia, because it could have a type for itself. Colors can be changed, like the resolution, this is just a start. I still consider making a foot under the screen. Well, I dont't know yet. Ezel 12:26, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Everybody who has acces to books and Internet could write for Wikipedia. That's why the Book and Monitor are one on Wikipedia. The text 'WIKIPEDIA' get's out of the book and screen, because it is not limited anymore to the happy few. Ezel 15:23, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)

any comments are welcom Ezel 15:23, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)

A second, slightly changed FlatBook. I prefer WikiFlatBook344-1, till the next comes out maybe. Ezel 20:56, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)

... and small

I have a question regarding the spelling you've used for "Wikipedia." Did you leave out the first "I" intentionally? Are either the W or the K supposed to do double-duty for two letters? If it is intentional, I think it looks like an error. Maybe you want to do another version with the missing "I"? —Pacific1982

Yes, the letters K and P are combined with the letter I, it's a very old way of writing the same with less letters. The combining letters is called 'ligatuur' in dutch. It is indeed a bit more difficult to read. I could do a normal lettering, but for me it's almost 'too normal'. I still have time to fiddeling around. Ezel 11:30, 24 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Advantages of a strange, not direcly readable logo: we spend more time on it. Look at the logo of [[1]]. Ezel 12:02, 24 Aug 2003 (UTC)

What can I say? This one is very clear it says: Wikipedia. Yep, this one is not my first choice. Wanna have a moni-foot under the logo? Ezel 16:03, 24 Aug 2003 (UTC)

I would like this Version, if there was a Globe and [[ ]] in the Book. Kris.

Sorry Kris, it's not going to happen. This logo is not going to be in the first ten. But thanks anyway. Ezel 12:58, 1 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Add topic