Problem: As last year: 360 and panorama photos is a mainstream media type. Articles & MediaViewer do not support it unless we direct users to toolsforge.
Who would benefit: readers and editors of wikis/Wikipedia technical articles, architecture and nature related articles would benefit. Also a good way to view panorama photos on mobile devices, where panoramas otherwise are real small
Proposed solution: Add support for Mediawiki to record the perspective of an image, either by reading the exif information, or by using a magic word. Add support in the front end to use panellum (examplecategory).
More comments: Proposed in the 2016 survey by Ahm masum, ranking at #15 overall with 58 support votes.
Phabricator tickets: phab:T151749. there is some open task in phabricator related to this ;[1][2][3]
This seems like a great idea, I often see long panoramic images in articles that would easily work as 360° images, and uploading such images should be encouraged. --Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (My global lock 😒🌏🔒) (My global unlock 😄🌏🔓) 13:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
this request is pretty urgent, not only because of the mainstream panorama movement, but also because environments can be seen and appreciated much better when viewed in 180° or 360°. a current example is the educational VR documentary about chernobyl. in the app you are in the abandoned buildings, you see the dimensions exactly. all the abstract art of photography with its selective angle and focus is trivialized by surround photography. it tells the truth. excellent for an encyclopedia. [from what i heard, wiki loves monuments has something like that in the pipeline.] Maximilian Schönherr (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I support it. This type of media are more popular for new generation, which we need to hit also. More over it helps to study some object.--Juandev (talk) 07:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Handing this off to Ahm masum who made the same proposal last year. I've removed my signature from the "Proposer" line. Ahm masum: all you need to do is sign. Best — MusikAnimaltalk 20:52, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Considero que es un formato cada vez mas utilizado, un gran modo de documentar, y tiene mucho mas llegada en su formato de visualización esférica que desplegada. TitiNicola (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
wondering what kind of projection the 360° tool above needs. it seems to swallow all kinds of images, but for example this one is not displayed properly. Maximilian Schönherr (talk) 19:57, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comply with TheDJ. Marzipano is a FREE licensed (apache 2.0) 360° media viewer for the modern web.We can Add support in the front end to use marzipano. And we know, Most 360 cameras and panorama-generation tools include "Photo Sphere metadata" when it save the photo. Personally I think, "Reading the exif information" would be appropriate for wiki environment. We can Add support for Mediawiki to record the perspective of an image. By hosting a "Exif Editor" at "WMCS" similar to "theXifer.net" (also free (GPL 1+ Artistic License)). To make upload process easy ,the upload wizard should have Exif metadata "tag detection" (the way Facebook do). -- Ahm masum (talk) 15:32, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nice but not a priority right now. This is a project one can do when all other important tasks are done. I don't see the need to rush this now, there aren't many people that have good panoramic cameras AND are able to use them AND license their work freely. Why cater to a small fraction of potential users? --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 02:44, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Actually you don't need a panoramic camera, though a panoramic tripod head is required for indoor 360. We have several featured pictures on Commons in 360 and enabling wiki support for this will definitely encourage more. It is a great way to experience the interior of a building. -- Colin (talk) 16:00, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I support it because it will show much better when viewed in 180° or 360°. Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk) 05:44, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Excellent idea! I support it. -Hasive • talk • 11:02, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Small gain, massive task for a very small group of users that actually can create this work and license freely. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 02:46, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support The cost of creating these media has dropped in recent years. We're adding 3D models soon, why not 360? More, and better, format support makes the appeal of contributing to our movement even greater. Ckoerner (talk) 21:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Vachovec1 (talk) 19:17, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Small gain, massive task for a very small group of users that actually can create this work and license freely. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 02:46, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
(talk) 07:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
_Eglise_Sainte-Marie_de_Quarante_France.jpg){kind=link}
