Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Wikivoyage/Logo/Round 2

< Wikivoyage‎ | Logo

It is desirable for Wikivoyage to have a new logo for its WMF launch which is tentatively scheduled mid January 2012. This will be a two-phase process. In round 1, we voted on the general concept of a logo. Now in round 2, we will flesh out the selected concept and select a final logo.

The winning logo!


All submissions are variations on the round 1 winner, displayed at right. Submissions have now closed.


Time frame - Round 2:

  • November 16–30: Open for submissions on variations of the chosen logo concept
  • December 1: Voting begins on round 2 submissions
  • December 8: Voting on round 2 closes at midnight GMT.


Logo contest guidelines:

  • All submitted logos must satisfy the guidelines at Logo#Proposing_new_logos, which have been set down by the WMF.
  • Our new logo should harmonize with existing WMF project logos (particularly the "content" wikis, as opposed to "administrative" wikis).
    • At the same time, however, the logo should not be so similar to existing logos (WMF or otherwise) as to cause possible brand confusion.
  • Our new logo must be language-independent (preferably no lettering in main logo, usable with "Wikivoyage" transliterated in all languages).
  • The logo should somehow reflect and convey what the travel guide is about - a free, open source, travel guide that anyone can edit.
  • The logo should be scalable and reusable. Consider how the logo will look: on the web page, as a favicon, on paper, on T-shirts, on smartphones and tablets, etc.
  • The logo should be adaptable. We may use the logo as a basis for the design of icons and other design elements. Designing those icons is not part of the contest, but be prepared to answer questions on these.
  • The logo's copyright must be transferred to the Wikimedia Foundation; that means (practically) that it has to be free of any copyright claims beyond the author's. "[T]he best practice may be to upload proposals on Commons under the Commons:Template:Copyright by Wikimedia, since the final trademark should be transferred to the Wikimedia Foundation." [1]
  • The logo should be in a vector format (e.g., SVG).
  • Wikimedia's Marketing Department gets to weigh in and Wikimedia's legal team gets a veto (for trademark or other legal reasons).
Legal guidelines
The purpose of this page is to determine the logo design for a new Wikimedia project. If your logo design is chosen as the winning logo for this project, you will enter into a contract to assign and license all of your rights in your submission to the Wikimedia Foundation.

To be eligible for this contest, you acknowledge and agree to grant to the Wikimedia Foundation an exclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, fully paid-up license to use, reproduce, and exploit in any way without limitation all copyright, trademark, publicity, and any other intellectual property or other proprietary rights in your logo.

This means that you must have the rights to the submission in order to license them. Therefore, you warrant that you are the owner of all copyright, trademark, moral, publicity, and other intellectual and proprietary rights to the proposed logo design and that it does not violate such rights of any third party.

And while we hope that there is no dispute between you and the the Wikimedia Foundation, we want to set some rules about how any disputes that may arise will be handled. By participating in the contest, you agree that your submission, your license of rights in it, and any dispute shall be governed by the laws of the United States of America and shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in the City and County of San Francisco, California.

Voting guidelines:

  • We will use en:Approval voting for this poll. You can vote for as many different options as you like, once per option. If you don't like an option, simply don't vote for it.
  • This poll is to select the final logo for Wikivoyage. Please place ONE and ONLY ONE logo in each section, so that there is no confusion over which logo is being voted for.


Logo #1: The original concept proposal edit

  •  
      The original proposal by Yiyi.

Support #1 edit

  1.  Raoli  14:49, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Goldzahn (talk) 15:48, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:52, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --MLWatts (talk) 16:30, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Quatar (talk) 17:53, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Homer (talk) 18:15, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Vale93b (talk) 18:32, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Xavier121 (talk) 18:57, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --singaporeAlice 21:25, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Tino 032 (talk) 21:48, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Staticshakedown (talk) 22:13, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Chevsapher (talk) 23:28, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Ziko (talk) 23:55, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Kdkeller (talk) 23:57, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Restu20 01:11, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. בנימין (talk) 04:57, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. -- GMM (talk) 05:56, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Silvio Gallio (talk) 07:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --Aiman Saeed أيـمـن. 08:23, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. εΔω 09:50, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
  21. --Accurimbono (talk) 09:58, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Cobbler (talk) 10:48, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. –Römert (talk) 12:27, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Aushulz (talk) 13:44, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Emperyan-message/ileti-WMTR 15:40, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Mark91it's my world 15:55, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Riggwelter (talk) 16:39, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Mey2008 (talk) 16:45, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. RolandUnger (talk) 19:18, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. SBryan (talk) 22:18, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Aschmidt (talk) 01:26, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Shizhao (talk) 06:25, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. – cacahuate talk 06:35, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Jalo 07:40, 3 December 2o012 (UTC)
  35. --Amarvudol (talk) 08:26, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --β16 - (talk) 09:25, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Vigevanese (talk) 10:16, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. --Jocian (talk) 11:51, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Erik Zachte (talk) 12:46, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. ChristianT (talk) 13:27, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Rapsar (talk) 16:59, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. -- Sir Gawain (talk) 17:30, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. --Nyan ∗ Dog 17:39, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  44. --01:51, 4 December 2012 (UTC) — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Katarighe (talk)
  45. -- ɑηsuмaη ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 06:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Legoktm (talk) 07:50, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Nanae (talk) 09:09, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  48. --FL3R (talk) 11:16, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Barbaforcuta (talk) 16:03, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  50. --Stillhart (talk) 19:12, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  51. --Geolina163 (talk) 21:05, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  52. –sumone10154(talk) 21:36, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  53. --Superchilum(talk to me!) 11:04, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  54. -- Xltel (talk) 00:22, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Arunram (talk) 05:59, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  56. --CyberRoby (talk) 09:53, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  57. --Gentenaar (talk) 11:00, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  58. //Shell 16:26, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  59. --Waithamai (talk) 16:46, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --A. Mahoney (talk) 17:15, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  61. -- Pedelecs (talk) 20:37, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Ajraddatz (Talk) 23:37, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  63. -- Elelicht (talk) 00:34, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  64. FredTC (talk) 06:12, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  65. --[[kgh]] (talk) 16:50, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  66. WikiPuppies bark dig 04:30, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Ldorfman (talk) 12:12, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  68. -- Steak (talk) 16:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion #1 edit

Logo #4: Bright colors edit

  •  
      Original
  •  
      4a More intense yellow color

If you think the colors need tweaking, do tell me. Perhaps a bit more saturation/intensity, do you think? This, that and the other (talk) 05:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support #4 edit

  1. 4a MER-C (talk) 09:13, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Bin im Garten (talk) 15:49, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 4a --Goldzahn (talk) 15:50, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. 4a Nanae (talk) 16:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. 4a --ZioNicco (talk) 17:20, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. 4a FSosio (talk) 17:50, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. 4a Quatar (talk) 17:53, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Pierpao (talk) 19:09, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. I prefer 4a --singaporeAlice 21:29, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. 4 --Paperoastro (talk) 23:40, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --LikeLifer (talk) 23:41, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. 4a -- Velorian (talk) 02:18, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. 4a: my second choice if Wikimedia colors are rejected. - εΔω 09:54, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
  14. 4a --CroMagnon (talk) 17:52, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. 4a --Shizhao (talk) 06:25, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. 4a but please add more color saturation so it is not pastel; I love these warm color arrows though contrasted with the sky blue --Rogerhc (talk) 19:54, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Original --Barbaforcuta (talk) 16:02, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Stillhart (talk) 19:13, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Lvova (talk) 13:05, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. 4a - LtPowers (talk) 19:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion #4 edit

  • I also like this. It would be nice to experiment with making it slightly darker/more intense, particularly the yellow, but I don't think it's necessary. I can see that it's a little reminiscient of Google, but I don't think it's too much, particularly since ours has no green. Superm401 | Talk 20:18, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
this is a much more merry composition than the original. Is it only on my screen or do the colours look a bit bland, a bit blended with grey sort of. /Johan Jönsson (talk) 20:32, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have added 4a. I fully agree that the yellow in particular was too dim. If you still think all the colours need a bit more "life", I can add another variation. This, that and the other (talk) 22:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo #5: Earthy colors edit

  •  
      5a Blue-green-brown-blue

Is the "sea blue" too deep or dark? This, that and the other (talk) 05:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support #5 edit

  1. MER-C (talk) 09:13, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Goldzahn (talk) 15:51, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. -David1010 (talk) 17:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Quatar (talk) 17:53, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Vogone (talk) 21:21, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Quaaludes (talk) 01:19, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Shizhao (talk) 06:26, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Conny (talk) 11:48, 3 December 2012 (UTC).[reply]
  9. DoppioM 15:08, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. //Shell 16:28, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. LtPowers (talk) 19:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion #5 edit

Logo #6.1 edit

svg mix version for your colors. Digr (talk) 15:43, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support #6.1 edit

  1. Tfinc (talk) 19:13, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Kaldari (talk) 19:40, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Litev (talk) 22:07, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Pratyeka (talk) 15:19, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion #6.1 edit

Love the shape, expecially the first, but I think the colours can be better if like the original. --F l a n k e r (talk) 18:55, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I modified it a little bit, what do you think? --F l a n k e r (talk) 19:33, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The third logo seems so nice! -- Yiyi (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
But I'd try to insert a different color with the blue in the external ring. -- Yiyi (talk) 20:46, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As with Logo #1, I feel that the use of WMF colours is not appropriate for a "regular" project like Wikivoyage. This, that and the other (talk) 00:33, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I love like the third logo. And I think that the shape differs much enough from the WMF Logo that it can use similar colours. --Christer • Talk 19:11, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The globe is a bit crowded; just keep the two arrows inside; well, I suppose that becomes logo #3 then. Fogg (talk) 04:09, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No i thinks is a good idea to get rid of the inside circle line. The difference with logo 3 is the absence of the shade (fond en français) in the backgroud. Also, getting out the circle line give more space for the original design inside the compass. So we have the original design forming a globe in the compass. -- ChristianT (talk) 13:16, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Could we see and compare one coloured version without the inside circle line, keeping the two arrows and the two "parallels" lines, and a second version with the inside circle line but without the two "parallels" lines? Thanks to the author for your work! Fogg (talk) 03:42, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, thanks for the quick update! I love V1, a good balance of everything; V3 seems a bit empty. V1 is my favourite so far and I like the colours too! Fogg (talk) 17:30, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nice Updates! The v1l is very lovely. I think the globe in v2l is a bit too small. --Christer • Talk 20:51, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I really like v1 and v2 - nice in many aspects. However, I have a concern: this logo is too "busy" (too much going on in such a small area). Other WMF logos have a simple design with one "main" element. This logo has two main elements (the compass rose and the arrow-globe), making it visually busy and "heavy" to look at. A logo needs to be "lighter" (i.e. less heavy) and easier to look at. This, that and the other (talk) 23:44, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Mhmm, I understood what you mean, but I think it is acceptable and every wiki logo has two elements. I've tried to remove one ring to simplify a bit, and than I've added some shadow and lights (see example 5). --F l a n k e r (talk) 21:20, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo #6.2 edit

Select different images. Digr (talk) 06:58, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support #6.2 edit

  1. v5 but only for the gradient, not for the circle  Raoli  14:51, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. v5 --Goldzahn (talk) 15:52, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. v4 --בנימין (talk) 16:09, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. v5 --Quatar (talk) 17:53, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. v5 --Xavier121 (talk) 18:57, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. v4 --Waldir (talk) 19:11, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. v5 --Stryn (talk) 22:09, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. v5 --Restu20 01:12, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. v5 --GMM (talk) 05:56, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. v5 --Patafisik (talk) 09:09, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. v4 --Christer • Talk 13:44, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. v5 --εΔω 16:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
  13. v4 --Alan ffm (talk) 17:03, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. v5 --Luigi.tuby (talk) 17:42, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. v5 -- Codicorumus  « msg 18:13, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Both Jalo 07:41, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. v4 --YMS (talk) 08:52, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. v4 --β16 - (talk) 09:26, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. v5 --Luckyz (talk) 10:16, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. v5 --Vigevanese (talk) 10:17, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. v5 --FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 12:25, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. v5 --Semolo75 (talk) 16:48, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. v4 --MB-one (talk) 17:37, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. v5 --Nyan ∗ Dog 17:40, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. v5 --jameserrico ∗ jameserrico 22:52, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. v5 --Barbaforcuta (talk) 16:01, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. I like v5. --Maxtirdatov (talk) 18:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. v5 Audiovore (talk) 06:55, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Superchilum(talk to me!) 11:04, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. v5 -- DerFussi 09:21, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. This is better, than the WTO logo. --TarzanASG (talk) 10:31, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. v5 --Sitic (talk) 11:34, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. v5 --Pakeha (talk) 15:08, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. v4 --A. Mahoney (talk) 17:15, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  35. v5 --Der Reisende (talk) 17:20, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. v5 Kaldari (talk) 19:43, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. v4 --Robot Monk (talk) 22:57, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. v5 --Elelicht (talk) 00:35, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Both --#Reaper (talk) 16:30, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. v4 Simon Burchell (talk) 15:43, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. v5 BetelgeuSeginus (talk) 17:40, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion #6.2 edit

Logo #7 edit

Support #7 edit

  1. ...

Discussion #7 edit

Too many arrows, just keep one./Johan Jönsson (talk) 20:35, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Too crowded, especially with the two colours of the globe underneath. Amqui (talk) 00:01, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Agree; just keep one arrow. Maybe the red one, possibly in a brighter tone--84.41.86.38 00:21, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the comments! I'll try to do better. --Stryn (talk) 07:01, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done with one arrow (7.3 - 7.7). Opinions/suggestions? --Stryn (talk) 14:59, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree to the point to avoid similar design elements of other sister projects--Nobelium (talk) 00:56, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I just want to add for consideration that there are people who have a red green color blindness so especially the 7.7 might be a bit difficult to identify the arrow. I don't know exactly. I am only weak in seeing those two colors--Nobelium (talk) 00:56, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think that removing the grid from the globe and experimenting with the globe element could improve this suggestion. The arrows in 7.8 look quite good. --Peter Talk 01:41, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo #8: Color variation edit

Support #8 edit

  1. Waldir (talk) 19:10, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Raoli  22:49, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Aushulz (talk) 13:46, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Pullus In Fabula (talk) 18:48, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. SBryan (talk) 22:19, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. ChristianT (talk) 13:24, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. –sumone10154(talk) 21:37, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion #8 edit

Logo #11: Arrows variation edit

A shape variation. Isatis78 (talk) 22:46, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support #11 edit

  1. Either one. LtPowers (talk) 19:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ...

Discussion #11 edit

Interesting design, but it reminds me a little (not much) of the double helix used by species:File:Wiki.png. The colors are also similar. πr2 (t • c) 15:14, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I like this one, and colour might be needed to change in order not to confuse with species(which I think is okay right now.)-Justincheng12345 (talk) 09:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I changed colors. There are also some little defects, but I shall change its if this design is selected. Isatis78 (talk) 21:51, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo #12: Simple colour variation edit

Just using simple colours, all of them different; reminds me of tropical fruit for some reason. --84.41.86.38 01:25, 20 November 2012 (UTC) (user:U5K0 on en:Wikipedia)[reply]

Support #12 edit

  1. Fra4481 (talk) 07:18, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Bin im Garten (talk) 15:50, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. ...

Discussion #12 edit

Logo #13: Globe fly edit

I have create this variaton that the idea of freedom to go where you want (this is a derivate work, see details of file) --Pava (talk) 09:03, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support #13 edit

  1. First one Nicolas1981 (talk) 01:07, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion #13 edit

is very funny :D ; reminds me of a bee fat --Pava (talk) 14:38, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo #14: art filter :) edit

My take on the wikivoyage logo. I transformed the smooth streaks and arrows to jagged wiggles. In my opinion, what differentiates a journey from a voyage is the adventure.I have used the wiggles as a metaphor for the uncertainties and surprises that form the core of an adventure. uttamg911 (talk) 23:22, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support #14 edit

  1. I like the style, though it doesn't seem complete (either limiting it to three strokes to have a very abstract logo or extending it to better shaping the globe would have been cool, I guess). However, my sympathy for this approach. --YMS (talk) 08:57, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion #14 edit

Logo #15: Earthy colors 2 edit

  •  
      15 Brown-blue-green-brown

This is similar to #5, but I have placed it separately because it is confusing when the two are presented side-by-side. This, that and the other (talk) 02:33, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support #15 edit

  1. MER-C (talk) 09:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Bin im Garten (talk) 15:52, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Quatar (talk) 17:53, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Vogone (talk) 21:21, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --CroMagnon (talk) 00:11, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Quaaludes (talk) 01:20, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Ermanon (talk) 16:33, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Shaundd (talk) 15:03, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. //Shell 16:37, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. LtPowers (talk) 19:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion #15 edit

Logo #17: Sphere ball edit

  •  
      Proposal of 2005

Support #17 edit

  1.  Raoli  14:51, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ...

Discussion #17 edit

Logo #19 edit

Support #19 edit

  1. --Stryn (talk) 08:58, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Alex brollo (talk) 16:29, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 19B Quatar (talk) 17:53, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Digr (talk) 05:50, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Wikisource style! :-) --Mys_721tx(talk) 05:58, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Wikisource style! I like it. εΔω 09:50, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
  7. RolandUnger (talk) 19:19, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. 19a --Vogone (talk) 21:21, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Shizhao (talk) 06:27, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. – cacahuate talk 06:31, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. 19c --Semiramide (talk) 06:40, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. 19a --YMS (talk) 08:53, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --IW 12:29, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. 19d --Waldir (talk) 14:27, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. 19c -- Kontos (talk) 23:44, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. — Linus (disk) 01:32, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Globe-trotter (talk) 02:22, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. 19b Wikisource style --Aubrey (talk) 08:22, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --Stillhart (talk) 19:13, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. 19c –sumone10154(talk) 21:38, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --JitteryOwl (talk) 23:55, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. 19b --Audiovore (talk) 06:56, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. All 19a,b,c&d -- Xltel (talk) 00:29, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. -- Texugo (talk) 10:06, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. This is better, than the WTO logo. --TarzanASG (talk) 10:30, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. 19d - Kpjas (talk) 21:22, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Maxtirdatov (talk) 11:34, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. 19a --[[kgh]] (talk) 16:53, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Carnildo (talk) 22:17, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion #19 edit

Testing in blue – cacahuate talk 07:29, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Really nice. I suggest you add a variant with slightly more intense light blue... it is just a bit too pale in my opinion. This, that and the other (talk) 00:08, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. --Waldir (talk) 19:13, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, added c and d with a more vibrant blue. We can always tweak colors a bit later if it were to win – cacahuate talk 06:31, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Very good! Finally a version which fits in with the other blue logos. — Linus (disk) 01:32, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I like the idea of using a significant color to make the project stand out. This variation looks interesting, but indeed, it is similar to Wikisource. Other color variations could be nice. --Globe-trotter (talk) 02:23, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What can I say, I like BLUE! Green, not so much. -- Xltel (talk) 00:34, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo #20 edit

Support #20 edit

  1. 20A Quatar (talk) 17:53, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Shizhao (talk) 06:28, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion #20 edit

Testing in green – cacahuate talk 07:29, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo #21 edit

Support #21 edit

  1. Digr (talk) 05:49, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. b Rodrigo Tetsuo Argentonm
  3. LtPowers (talk) 19:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. ...


Discussion #21 edit

Testing in purple – cacahuate talk 07:29, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo #23: The Blue Planet edit

  •  
      23a
    Added blue planet shape from Wikinews logo.
  •  
      23b
    Moreover added trails of the arrows.

The addition of the blue planet ensures compatibility with a wider variety of backgrounds, as well as making the logo more compact. -- Codicorumus  « msg 11:53, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support #23 edit

  1. --Stryn (talk) 08:58, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Bin im Garten (talk) 15:53, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 23a --Goldzahn (talk) 15:58, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. For me 23b it's good. Chingrid (talk) 18:33, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 18:33, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. 23a --O--o (talk) 23:33, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. 23a בנימין (talk) 04:57, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. 23a -- GMM (talk) 05:58, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. 23a --Aushulz (talk) 13:47, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. 23a --Vogone (talk) 21:21, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. No preferences --Lucas (talk) 05:02, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. No preferences --YMS (talk) 08:54, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. 23a - Vigevanese (talk) 10:18, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. 23a Jpatokal (talk) 11:09, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. 23a --Avenue (talk) 11:57, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. 23a Yann (talk) 13:29, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. 23a -- ɑηsuмaη ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 06:48, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. 23a --Feuerst (talk) 12:18, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. 23a --Geolina163 (talk) 21:07, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --Superchilum(talk to me!) 11:05, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. 23a -- Xltel (talk) 00:25, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. 23a -- Mulleflupp (talk) 08:48, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. 23a -- DerFussi 09:22, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:03, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Shaundd (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Pakeha (talk) 15:11, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. 23a --A. Mahoney (talk) 17:15, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. 23a - Kpjas (talk) 21:24, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Maxtirdatov (talk) 11:32, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. 23a -- Balou46 (talk) 13:17, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. 23a --Carnildo (talk) 22:17, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion #23 edit

More compact? LtPowers (talk) 18:33, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive my poor English-language skills. I mean "compact" as in "compact design", perhaps "solid" may clarify the concept. Although the alternation between the visual perception of four thin strips suspended in space and the perception of the virtual sphere can result in a good effect, that void can lead to a bad rendering over dark backgrounds or those similar to one of the colors. -- Codicorumus  « msg 15:13, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I quite like this, it subtly but effectively emphasizes the "planet" idea of the original and looks a touch more professional. Jpatokal (talk) 11:11, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo #24: Negative spaces edit

  •  
      (24a) White on violet
  •  
      (24b) White on slate blue
  •  
      (24c) White on grass-green
  •  
      (24d) White on wine

I like negative spaces; what can I say? How's the color? It'd be nice to find a way to make it not-monochrome. LtPowers (talk) 19:00, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have added and numbered the 3 new colors created by LtPowers. The votes util "Digr" have been written before this insertion, the others after. --Lucas (talk) 06:42, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support #24 edit

  1. I like the concept but not this color. --Quaaludes (talk) 01:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I like the concept but not this color. <add> I like the blue version (24b)! </add> --Lucas (talk) 05:03, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. I like the concept and the color. It's distinctive, and not easily confused with the other project logos. -- The Anome (talk) 12:16, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Globe-trotter (talk) 13:27, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Digr (talk) 14:29, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. 24b MER-C (talk) 11:40, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. 24b --Goldzahn (talk) 21:20, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. 24b Avenue (talk) 01:13, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. 24b Shaundd (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Any. LtPowers (talk) 19:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Good idea. Sad that it will not win. --Atsirlin (talk) 22:08, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion #24 edit

Color variations edit

  •  
      White on slate blue
  •  
      White on grass-green
  •  
      White on wine
I like the white with blue. בנימין (talk) 15:48, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Blue or wine. Can these be added above with clear references (v1, v2, etc) so we can vote on them? :) --Waldir (talk) 00:00, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have added them in the first paragraph and changed the logo-name using the words of its author: I hope that the section is now more user friendly. :-) --Lucas (talk) 06:42, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikivoyage/Logo/Round_2&oldid=24910921"