Open Science for Arts, Design and Music/Workshop design 2022

OS-ADM   Project   Calendar   Training   Guidelines   Case studies   Publishers   DMP   Report   Credits  

Workshop to design the format of the Open Science for Arts, Design and Music guidelines.

Mendrisio, September 29, 2022, 10am/5pm.

Participants:

  • Iolanda Pensa, SUPSI
  • Chiara Barbieri, SUPSI
  • Giovanni Profeta, SUPSI
  • Max Fonseca, SUPSI
  • Antonella Autuori, SUPSI
  • Erzsébet Tóth-Czifra, DARIAH-EU
  • Anna Picco Schwendener, CCdigitallaw
  • Suzanna Marazza, CCdigitallaw

Final output:

  • selection of visual materials to be developed by the next project meeting (3 Nov.)

Agenda

edit

Morning:

1 – presentation of the guidelines
2 – case studies:
  • discussion of targeted groups and user experience
  • challenges of accessibility

Afternoon:

1 – case study:
  • multimedia output
2 – visual materials:
  • identification of typologies of visual materials: decision trees, tables, checklists and templates
  • selection of examples to be developed before the project meeting on Nov. 3, 2022



User experience case studies:
1- researcher who has already published a book and wants to release it again in OA: the book includes images and documents by third parties who signed an agreement only for the print version.

  • Negotiate with publisher
  • Ask rightholders’ permission

2- researcher who wants to launch an online archive/database collecting images from different museums who are also partners of the research project.

  • How and where to store
  • Ask rightholders’ permission
  • Long term longevity of website
  • CC licences, sustainability

3- researcher applying for fundings for a new research project

  • DMP
  • Founders requirements

4- teacher who wants to release slides in OA

  • CC licences
  • Repositories

5- students’ video and audio recordings of interviews to be published on social media

Tools on mediawiki

edit

Visual materials: examples and suggestions

edit

Report

edit
  • discussions about user testing led to a reconsideration of the overall structure of the guidelines;
  • feedback from design-team: the designers flagged up a need to focus on a hierarchical structure in order to guide users;
  • information architecture: the content-team restructured the information flow of the "what-book" "what- image" sections.

Decisions and next phases

edit
  • information architecture: the content-team needs to rearrange and simplify content; compile a user flow for each information;
  • debriefing meeting: organise a meeting between the content- and design-teams to agree on a structure and visualisation on meta.

Output

edit