Meta:Requests for adminship/Memo18

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Memo18 edit

I would like a temporary adminship because there romanian community not exist, I need to right for seven days. Thanks, Memo18^{(contribs|talk|ro.wp(t))} 09:47, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question: What exactly do you need the sysop rights for? --Mercy 10:16, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete vandalism, block vandals, help romanian community; Memo18^{(contribs|talk|ro.wp(t))} 10:28, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, for the vandal fighting part a permanent adminship may be best. Could you please explain how you'd like to the Romanian community? What do you want to do to help? -Barras ^talk 16:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I asked only temporary because I want to see that I can permanently. I say that I want to help the Romanian community because meta.wm not have any romanian admin that if one romanian needs help to know who to call. But, if need permanent, not problem. Memo18^{(contribs|talk|ro.wp(t))} 19:39, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As there doesn't seem to be a specific task, for what the temporary adminship is, I don't see a reason to grant it. If there would be need to update numerous MediaWiki pages that need to be translated or something, I'd say ok, but in this case I oppose the granting of the mop. Furthermore, I don't see any quick deletion request or vandalism reverts on meta which doesn't make it better for you to gain this tool. And last but not least, you're only sysop on flaggedrevs_labswikimedia with 7 edits there. I don't consider this as a regular adminship elected by community. So I'd say you shouldn't be a sysop on meta. -Barras ^talk 20:14, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - per my comments above. --Barras ^talk 20:14, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Barras. It doesn't seem like you have a genuine need for the tools. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:35, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - not clear how you could "help romanian community". LeinaD (t) 23:05, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose given your history on a multitude of other projects in which you simply attempt to gather as many flags as you can. For example, please see Memo18's edits on test.wiki. Examples of other denied requests include commons, en.wikilabs, flaggedrevs.labs, incubator, and mediawiki. Tiptoety ^talk 19:32, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Barras and Tiptoety. — Dferg ☎ 22:32, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus to promote. vvv^t 22:39, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]