Meta:Requests for adminship/Abigor

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Abigor edit

Abigor has done excellent work on Commons, and I'm happy to see he's made a transition to working on Meta as well. Primarily, he has been doing countervandalism and tagging pages for speedy deletion, but he's also been doing some behind-the-scenes maintenance like categorization. I hope to rope him into helping with a few other things soon as well. I think he'd make a good addition to Meta's team of sysops, and I hope you agree. — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 17:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Co-nomination - it is my pleasure to co-nominate Abigor , per as mike i think he would be Great admin as he is on commons and incubator and simple wikibooks --Mardetanha ^talk 17:39, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:-D after three editconflicts.. I accept. Abigor talk 17:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support, sure. --M/ 17:41, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, creo que hace un buen trabajo. —Dferg (talk) 17:41, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support helpful, useful and trustworthy user. Finn Rindahl 18:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Per nominators. Alex Pereira ^falaê 18:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support I've seen him around on a number of projects and agree with the nominators. --Erwin(85) 19:10, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, this one knows where his towel is. ++Lar: t/c 21:53, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, hardworking user. Leinad 22:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per this extraordinarily poor judgement. Majorly ^talk 22:38, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Majorly. Poor judgement is not very helpful for the role of sysop. Razorflame 22:44, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Sorry. Enthousiastic and hardworking user indeed, but sometimes quite clearly lacking experience when it comes to judgement issues. Seems a bit too eager too, if I may say so. Wutsje 23:10, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I didn't know about this request until it was linked to me, but let this be an indication that there are no hard feelings. PeterSymonds 23:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per wutsje, too soon imo. oscar 01:32, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - for now, for lack of experience. The user has enthusiasm, has recently been working on double redirects (which is in fact no longer a problem any more), and has even repeatedly "fixed" our demonstrative subpages of help:redirect or nominated them for deletion, and also used an unauthorised bot to flood the recentchanges list in zh-yue:, without realising it was not a good idea. But keep learning and you would get my support one day.

Hillgentleman 06:38, 17 March 2009 (UTC) withdraw Abigor talk 08:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate withdrawal. Sorry to see this and hope you'll consider running again in future. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 09:07, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]