Controversial content/Timeline

This page serves as a timeline for the controversial content debate on Wikimedia wikis.

2003 edit

User:Viking censoring sexually explicit content, User:Kils admin status removed

2004 edit

Offensive content - a proposal for a filtering or labeling system to hide user-unwanted content.

2005 edit

February edit

English Wikipedia:

First vote on the Goatse.cx image (the debate would go on for several years, see the FAQ on en:Talk:Goatse.cx)
Jimbo Wales removes an image of autofellatio from the article.
w:Wikipedia:Descriptive image tagging proposed (labeling system), fails.
Wikipedia:Graphic and potentially disturbing images - rejected
Wikipedia:Image censorship - closed

April edit

meta: End-user suppression of ALL images

en:Wikipedia:Content labeling proposal - failed

A developer initiates the MediaWiki:Bad image list on the English Wikipedia (which restricts the display of certain images), with an autofellatio image as its first entry

May edit

Perennial Proposals: Filter or Site for Young Students

August edit

proposal en:Wikipedia:Toby - failed

WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency (later "WikiProject Wikipedians for encyclopedic merit") founded on the English Wikipedia (Signpost coverage: "WikiProject VfD spurs controversy, record vote count")

2006 edit

February edit

A poll is held on the English Wikipedia to decide whether to include cartoons of Muhammad in the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy article. (Signpost coverage: "Controversial cartoon leads to fierce debate", "Pakistan briefly blocks Wikipedia")

A proposal for simple "no image loading" preference on Wikimedia related sites (formatting broken)

March edit

Proposal for potentially offensive images - opposed

September edit

Publicgirluk case on the English Wikipedia (Signpost coverage: "Sexual images spark debate")

2007 edit

August edit

The regional court of Berlin dismisses criminal charges brought by an administrator of the German Wikipedia in April 2005 over alleged violation of the German law against the distribution of pornographic content by a user whose editing activity largerly concerned articles about pornographic actresses. The user had posted a link on a talk page to a web site that was illegal for minors to view. But because of the limited visibility of his edit, which had been made in the middle of the night and was reverted after one minute, the judge ruled that the statute did not apply. (Signpost coverage: "German user acquitted for distribution of pornography", Kurier coverage: "Verbreitung pornografischer Schriften in der Wikipedia – Freispruch für Benutzer:Mutter Erde")

December edit

A German politician files criminal charges over the use of Nazi symbols in articles on the German Wikipedia (Signpost coverage: "Wikipedia dragged into German politics over Nazi images")

2008 edit

January edit

proposal for ICRA Content rating - opposed

February edit

An online petition to remove images of the Islamic prophet from the corresponding article on the English Wikipedia receives 100,000 signatures within two months (Signpost coverage: "Petition seeks to remove images of Muhammad")

April edit

"Safe Search" or "Adult Filter" function proposal (April 2008) - opposed

May edit

WorldNetDaily article (Signpost coverage: "Explicit sexual content draws fire")

December edit

Virgin Killer case (Signpost coverage: "Wikipedia blocked over concerns of child pornography")

2009 edit

January edit

Commons:Sexual content/2009 Original COM:SEX proposal, started December 2008 with final revision January 2009. (rejected by consensus)

August edit

The longtime controversy about images in en:Rorschach test generates media coverage (Signpost summaries: "Dispute over Rorschach test images", "Doctors argue about meaning of inkblots")

2010 edit

March edit

The German Wikipedia features w:de:Vulva on its main page, including an image. Despite heavy controversy, the editorial decision to use the image is upheld in a 30:29 quick poll. "Principle of Least Astonishment" mentioned.[1] (Signpost coverage: "Explicit image featured on German Wikipedia's main page")

April edit

Larry Sanger creates controversy by suggesting that Wikimedia Commons is hosting child pornography. (Signpost coverage: "Larry Sanger accuses Wikimedia of hosting illegal images")

Commons:Sexual content/April 2010 - an evolution of January 2009 proposal. (rejected by consensus)

Commons:WikiProject Erotica/image level demo media filtering

May edit

In response to Larry Sanger's comments (and surrounding media coverage), the Wikimedia Board issues a statement about appropriate educational content, Board of Trustee member Jimmy Wales "wheel wars" to delete images[2][3] and eventually relinquished many "rights" at the request of the community. (Signpost coverage: "Porn madness")

June edit

The Wikimedia Board directs the Executive Director to commission a study regarding controversial content on Wikimedia wikis. This included a Board resolution. (Signpost coverage: "Board resolution on offensive content")

July edit

Requests for comment/ace.wikipedia and Prophet Muhammad images. aceh admins put notice template demanding deletion of Muhammad images on Wikipedia/Wikimedia, ends with desysopping

Requests for comment/Prophet Muhammad images around Wikimedia projects recieved little feedback and closed August 7 with no action due to en:WP:NOTCENSORED.

September edit

The results of the study are announced.

December edit

commons: Sexual content, Second poll for promotion to policy (no consensus)

2011 edit

February edit

Ryan Kaldari asks the Gendergap mailing list whether "the Principle of Least Astonishment needs to be encoded into some kind of policy or guideline"?[4]

May edit

The Wikimedia Board unanimously passes a "Controversial content" resolution that calls for "the Executive Director, in consultation with the community, to develop and implement a personal image hiding feature that will enable readers to easily hide images hosted on the projects that they do not wish to view, either when first viewing the image or ahead of time through preference settings."

August edit

The Wikimedia Foundation holds an image filter referendum. (15 August - 30 August 2011)

The German Wikipedia hosts a poll regarding an image filter. (25 August - 15 September 2011)

September edit

Results of the image filter referendum are announced.

heated panel discussion of image filter with WMF Board member on German WikiCon

The German Wikipedia poll finds 86% opposed to image filter.

Sue Gardner blogs about her views on the discussion surrounding the image filter.

October edit

French Wikipedia poll on image filter. 81% opposed

Board of Trustees sends a letter to foundation-l. ("We are not going to revisit the resolution from May, for the moment: we let that resolution stand unchanged.")

News from Germany: White Bag protest movement against the image filter and thinking about a fork

German Wikipedia starts fork discussion (not an official poll)

Spanish Wikipedia holds a poll on image filter majority opposed

Sue Gardner says she is no longer planning to create a category-based image filtering system.

November edit

In an interview with Zeit Online (in German), Sue Gardner assures she will go for a new filter concept and will not install an image filter against the declared will of the German community. Also, she gives a presentation in Hanover (in English) covering the issue on slides 15-23: [5]. Transcript of the relevant part.

December edit

RfC on the English Wikipedia for the adoption of the "principle of least astonishment" in dealing with controversial content (rejected as proposed).

2012 edit

February edit

Content rating (again) clear consensus against this proposal

July edit

Image filtering proposal from Jimbo Wales

wmf:Resolution:Personal image hiding feature rescinded the previous resolution.

2015-2016 edit

Controversial maps (with involvement of the Wikimedia Foundation legal department): phabricator:T113008 and more.